Home Music Lane

It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes.

RE: Seriously?

I did end it. You'll find no discussion here of the relative merits of the performance in question. I am merely attempting to explain to you why I did so.

So, you think I should have taken the time to find the right version. No doubt you're right. I thought so at the time. I also thought that I was tired and had a million other things to do, and I didn't feel particularly inclined to search for it on You Tube, and that, as I said, the version that came up in Google would make my point. You may disagree. That is your right. However, you made a number of inaccurate statements about me, and then called me stupid. That last is, I believe, what they call an insult, but you'll have to forgive little old stupid me if I got that wrong.

""That" being what? Were you going from memory of the 1933 recording or were you commenting on the content of the youtube video that you had just posted."

If you look in Stereophile c. 2008, you'll find a letter from me in which I critique the anomalies in the otherwise laudable Zenph Tatum and Gould releases. The first track on the Tatum is, you guessed it, the 1933 "Tea For Two."

You are so off base here it is incredible.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.