Well, of course, there was always Liszt - in the 1840s & 50s [nt] - Mike Porper

Music Lane

It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - The Rach 2nd - Poles Apart 14:00:53 05/02/12 (29)

That should have been Bartok 2 & *3* -- no one noticed? NT - Poles Apart 20:03:27 05/09/12 (1)

I guess I didn't - Chris from Lafayette 21:10:28 05/09/12 (0)

Janis? As glib as Wild in that work. (But Rach was the glibbest of all) Pick up Reiner/Rubinstein and be - jdaniel@jps.net 19:59:40 05/08/12 (11)

I think you've got it backwards - Chris from Lafayette 22:18:04 05/08/12 (10)

oh man, he's always too fast. Rach, Prokofiev.... Not very beguiling, IMHO. nt - jdaniel@jps.net 07:18:20 05/09/12 (9)

I get it - you mean he's not FLABBY like so many other pianists [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 17:14:32 05/09/12 (8)

For non-FLABBY, try Rubinstein/Koussevitsky... - Brian Cheney 15:43:21 05/10/12 (7)

Spotify had only the 1946 Rubinstein/Golschmann/NBC Performance - Chris from Lafayette 21:47:01 05/10/12 (4)

RE: Spotify had only the 1946 Rubinstein/Golschmann/NBC Performance - Brian Cheney 11:20:33 05/11/12 (2)

Chapter and Verse - Chris from Lafayette 11:35:47 05/11/12 (1)

RE: Chapter and Verse - Brian Cheney 11:45:16 05/11/12 (0)

"Who Plays All of the Notes?" LOL [nt] - Mike Porper 08:40:08 05/11/12 (0)

I heard that Reiner was really cracking with whip with Rubinstein. . . - Chris from Lafayette 17:51:57 05/10/12 (1)

No problem, : ), however, it's the only performance that still interests me (along with their Rhapsody): - jdaniel@jps.net 07:11:38 05/11/12 (0)

RE: The Rach 2nd - John N 07:20:47 05/06/12 (6)

RE: The Rach 2nd - Brian Cheney 14:28:39 05/06/12 (5)

RE: The Rach 2nd - John N 19:57:03 05/06/12 (0)

I once knew a woman. . . - Chris from Lafayette 16:48:33 05/06/12 (3)

Big surprise to his wife and two kids! . - Brian Cheney 12:29:31 05/07/12 (1)

LOL! - I guess we'll never know what he had on the side! [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 13:44:24 05/07/12 (0)

Well, of course, there was always Liszt - in the 1840s & 50s [nt] - Mike Porper 07:51:25 05/07/12 (0)

RE: The Rach 2nd - smart845 17:37:30 05/03/12 (0)

RE: The Rach 2nd - Chris from Lafayette 15:57:51 05/02/12 (3)

Note for Chris - John C. - Aussie 18:59:57 05/03/12 (1)

John - I'm so sorry - will reply soon - e-mail has not changed [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 23:09:11 05/03/12 (0)

My intro to Farnadi... - Poles Apart 21:21:43 05/02/12 (0)

Not to neglect Gieseking and Mengelberg! - Poles Apart 15:33:45 05/02/12 (0)

Oooo, Thanks - Mike Porper 15:31:01 05/02/12 (0)

RE: The Rach 2nd - rbolaw 15:15:37 05/02/12 (0)

Follow Ups

Well, of course, there was always Liszt - in the 1840s & 50s [nt] - Mike Porper 07:51:25 05/07/12 (0)

Well, of course, there was always Liszt - in the 1840s & 50s [nt]

Post a Message!