In Reply to: RE: Ugly musicians need better marketing - I'm stumped to give you a suggestion [nt] ;-) posted by ahendler on March 29, 2012 at 12:19:44:
Not entirely, IMHO. Stage performers, including classical musicians, have always been conscious of their appearance as a way to cultivate their celebrity. Stokowski kept that flowing mane of hair that gave him a distinguished look to a very advanced age, as well as a highly-developed sense of showmanship. Anyone who walks onto a stage has to expect their appearance to be put in issue, not necessarily how good looking they are, but how they carry themselves for sure. In fact, charisma and stage presence is far more effective than mere good looks, IMO. Alas, many musicians utterly lack both, and audiences know it.
However, the marketers who attempt to promote beautiful young women are making a big mistake, IMO. Charisma (and talent, of course) win the day. The industry of displaying the bodies of beautiful women does more than well enough without needing classical musicians.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Ugly musicians need better marketing - I'm stumped to give you a suggestion [nt] ;-) - rbolaw 13:18:45 03/29/12 (7)
- RE: Ugly musicians need better marketing - I'm stumped to give you a suggestion [nt] ;-) - Kas 07:06:13 03/30/12 (6)
- "some scantily clad babe on the cover" - Chris from Lafayette 08:45:03 03/30/12 (5)
- There is an entire genre of collecting Lps for the hot babe on the cover... nt - Elizabeth 04:04:56 04/02/12 (1)
- RE: There is an entire genre of collecting Lps for the hot babe on the cover... nt - pbarach 16:13:17 04/02/12 (0)
- Man, am I jealous... - srl1 12:03:39 03/30/12 (1)
- Exactly right - That's the whole point of this sub-thread! [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 12:24:55 03/30/12 (0)
- I don't know, I bet it tastes good. - tinear 10:16:11 03/30/12 (0)