Home Music Lane

It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes.

Not to rain on anyone else's parade. . .

. . . but I consider several of the names mentioned in this thread so far to be technically weak. It's very well to say that a given pianist may not be the greatest technician but is able to get to the heart of the music - but IMHO a certain minimum technical standard is required, and for my money, some pianists do not meet that standard on their recordings. Schumann's music is particularly revealing of technical lapses, every bit as much as it's revealing of any lack of interpretive poetry. I can't stomach some pianists' dogged traversal of these demanding works, and in most cases, I feel the reasons for their failure are technical as much as interpretive.

Then, there are also some surprising failures by pianists who have technique to burn - I'm thinking of some of Marc Andre Hamelin's Schumann recordings, which combine sections of absolutely miraculous playing with sections of indifferent interpretation. Maddening!

Having said that, I do have certain pianists I trust in this repertoire, and they're mostly Russian, starting with the big one - that would be Richter. Even Richter is surpassed in some works however. Others would include Demidenko, Lugansky, Volodos, Postnikova (if you can find her recording of Kreisleriana), Egorov, then, moving westward, Pogorelich and Lazic. In the Noveletten the French pianist, Claire Desert, has a great recording.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Herbie's Audio Lab  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.