I know there may be some question as to whether the version done by ABQ is considered among the top, but my question really has to do with the releases. Why does it seem the 1991 (so called BMG) version seem to be more sought after than the 2001 - which I though was just a re-release of the 1991? Is the 2001 version not mastered as well? Is the 1991 really better?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Dvorak's "American" String Quartet - the two Berg releases - tonyptony 04:21:36 03/17/12 (12)
- I wound up buying the... - tonyptony 15:59:27 03/19/12 (5)
- Two out of three ain't bad! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 07:59:25 03/20/12 (4)
- IYO which one is the dud? - tonyptony 08:20:45 03/20/12 (3)
- Well. . . - Chris from Lafayette 11:25:01 03/20/12 (2)
- RE: Well. . . - Brian Cheney 13:23:31 03/23/12 (1)
- Yes - for every rule, there's always an exception or two [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 14:26:28 03/24/12 (0)
- Is the ABQ considered a worthy performance? - tonyptony 14:03:31 03/17/12 (2)
- Panocha is my favorite... - classfolkphile 18:43:15 03/18/12 (0)
- Takacs Quartet - boboli 17:57:31 03/17/12 (0)
- RE: Dvorak's "American" String Quartet - the two Berg releases - rbolaw 09:16:28 03/17/12 (2)
- You have to check the fine print on EMI re-issues... - Daverz 12:07:36 03/17/12 (0)
- RE: Dvorak's "American" String Quartet - the two Berg releases - tonyptony 11:02:03 03/17/12 (0)