In Reply to: Thanks for your comments. posted by MichaelV* on March 2, 2012 at 11:58:43:
My problem with this work arose on playing the Leonard Pennario version from 1957 which is on the box set "The Early Works". I knew I had heard this Fantasy before and even had a version of it somewhere in my various CDs. Pennario sounded very different from my vague recollection of many years ago.
So I set off on a treasure hunt looking for the CD I knew of this. It was the Artur Rubinstein 1965 recording on RCA. Long story short, I found the Rubinstein and yes, what a difference. Rubinstein sounds poetic, in a sense, but "conventional". Enjoyable, yes. But Pennario makes this sound almost like a modern work. Much heavier left hand. And better sound too, even though mono. Excellent technically, although Rubinstein, even in 1965, had some great chops.
I have learned that Schumann is a difficult composer to interpret. I grew up with the Szell symphony recordings and only later in life did I come to prefer slower and more romantic interpretations of Schumann symphonies, eg, Celibidache in Sym 3.
Along with that, I've listened to some movements of this on Youtube. Richter's was very impressive. De Larrocha's was quite moving. I never would have thought to consider De Larrocha before. Before the week is out I should be getting Pollini's version and I'm most anxious to learn about how he compares.
To think, it is only in my declining years that I've discovered this wonderful piece of music. I never thought I'd have this much fun in my old age.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Update - MichaelV8 17:35:50 03/02/12 (0)