In Reply to: Re: Not sure I understand... posted by Thornhill on April 10, 2007 at 14:05:49:
actually reading the score, or as a musician? THAT is very cool. I must admit, I do not have the experience to analyze a performance that way. What caught me with the Litton was the "seriousness" of purpose -- the music doesn't sound like a pastiche or a caricature of itself -- combined with the pure heft of the orchestra, and the recording quality that supports it. The technical nuances of the score-vs-performance weren't a factor. I'll be honest with you, unless it was an outright abomination, I'm not sure I care. I'll drag poor Furtwangler-in-Beethoven up again as an example. HIS take on Beethoven is so far "over the edge" that one can either consider it to be profound or slander -- it may be both. Interestingly, it's entertaining either way...although the composer may (if he could express it!;-) have had an opinion about the interpretive liberties.Preferences aside, the Litton "just did it for me" (apparantly a lot of others too, FWIW). I never enjoyed Ives before, and this was a breakthrough. If the Litton recording turns more people towards the music, that is a good thing. I believe it has.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You're making these judgements based on... - SE 04:23:42 04/11/07 (7)
- Re: You're making these judgements based on... - Thornhill 07:10:40 04/11/07 (6)
- Some thoughts on all this (long long looooong) - M. Lucky 09:27:55 04/11/07 (0)
- P.S. Schermerhorn was really on the CUSP... - SE 08:06:16 04/11/07 (1)
- Typing stutter! n/t - SE 08:08:33 04/11/07 (0)
- You mean the one on Naxos? It gets RAVES... - SE 07:59:09 04/11/07 (2)
- Yep. (nt) - Thornhill 09:41:18 04/11/07 (0)
- The Naxos... - M. Lucky 09:33:55 04/11/07 (0)