Home Music Lane

It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes.

"New" Conductors: New Interpretations or New MUSIC?...

68.57.91.150

Reading more about the fledgling conductor Gustavo Dudamel (nappy haired, no less!:-), I am told that his forte is "colorful music" -- he's apparantly quite strong at bringout orchestral textures in animated music. That's a very good thing. So, this post is not meant as a criticsm in any way.

I have a question, however. Are we -- as fans and concert-goers and collectors of recordings -- seeking, really, ANYONE to continue to perform the "old classics" which we have heard in spades. I mean, if I want animated/unique Beethoven or Bruckner or Shostakovich I know exactly where to look. OK, it is DEFINITELY arguable that we don't need more/new RECORDINGS of mainstay works (IMO). "Live performances" may be somewhat different (it's always great to see a live performance of a favorite work done really well)...but that doesn't quite gel with me either.

I want COMPLETELY NEW MUSIC to begin to be delivered with greater frequency in our concert halls. I thing it is an OBLIGATION of new/young conductors to represent "their generation" (or even neglegted older ones) to bring forth not just supposed new "insights" in well-worn works, but to extend the tradition of Classical music.

To put it somewhat differently: If this is not done, is it a failure on the part of these new conductors? Further, doesn't that reduce the value of conductor to something like a "paid employee" responsible for supporting a ticket base and operating budget -- nothing wrong with that -- it's just...mundane.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Topic - "New" Conductors: New Interpretations or New MUSIC?... - SE 04:37:13 04/10/07 (41)


You can not post to an archived thread.