|
Classical Court From Perotin to Prokofiev (and beyond), performed by Caruso to Khatia, it's all here. |
|
|
|
Classical Court From Perotin to Prokofiev (and beyond), performed by Caruso to Khatia, it's all here. |
|
In Reply to: Do you judge hi-rez classical music actually sounds better than 44/16? posted by John C. - Aussie on June 9, 2021 at 15:26:19:
I've never been able to convince myself that hi-res is any better for home playback. I've tried a few randomized tests by comparing original hi-res files to downsampled and then upsampled files. And 16/44 can sound just as good in my experience.
24/96 seems obviously better for recording. And there doesn't seem to be any reason to stick to 16/44 when everything is streaming now. I'd be happy if all downloads and streaming switched to 24/48 as a standard.
Any sampling rate above 96 kHz is silly, though, and I believe the only reason people think it's better is due to a widespread misunderstanding of sampling theory as "connecting the dots" that media companies seem happy to propagate.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Do you judge hi-rez classical music actually sounds better than 44/16? - Daverz 13:11:27 06/11/21 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
