|
Classical Court From Perotin to Prokofiev (and beyond), performed by Caruso to Khatia, it's all here. |
|
|
|
Classical Court From Perotin to Prokofiev (and beyond), performed by Caruso to Khatia, it's all here. |
|
In Reply to: Do you judge hi-rez classical music actually sounds better than 44/16? posted by John C. - Aussie on June 9, 2021 at 15:26:19:
What I get in some Hi-rez is a bit more of the spatial stuff than the same in red book.
BUT Hi-rez is not really necessary for that as many beautifully recorded old recordings, some originally analog--some originally digital, can attest. It may take a high performing DAC to bring it out. Consider the Monteaux Daphnis and Chloe (analog) or the Ashkenazy Rachmaninov Symphony 1 (digital) for ex. Beautiful wall-to-wall sound. I'm sure we could all name a bunch.
IMHO it is the laziness of record producers and engineers who, rather than dong a lot of serious listening to mike set-ups, throw out a forest of microphones and "fix it in the mix" which is to blame. So much current recording is far less satisfying then the old stuff.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Do you judge hi-rez classical music actually sounds better than 44/16? - Mel 09:33:07 06/10/21 (2)
- probably not laziness - DrChaos 10:03:06 06/10/21 (1)
- RE: probably not laziness - Mel 10:51:41 06/10/21 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
