In Reply to: Conspiracy theories posted by geoffkait on July 22, 2022 at 04:27:05:
"The AR15 was known to have an issue of firing inadvertently due to design flaw."
The Google search (link) suggests that this above statement is patently false..... Sorry......
Also note that saying an "AR15 has a design flaw" is like saying an "airplane has a design flaw"..... Both could have radically different designs (a Cessna and a Boeing 757, for example), yet still fall under such designations.
Now a specific airplane..... The Boeing 737 Max, for example, does have serious design flaws..... And I would personally avoid flying in that aircraft, if such occasion were to come forth. (There is probably a specific brand and model of AR15 that does have a problem with accidental discharges. But for one model of AR15 that has such flaw, there are over hundreds of brands and models that don't.)
"At the same time it would obviously be a logical error to make the argument that just because there are such things as conspiracy theories then anything you wish to discredit is non scientific or a conspiracy theory."
The term "conspiracy theory" has been bandied about too often in recent time, often treating the one stating it was someone who should be banned from discussion forums. (I've personally been banned from a discussion board expressly for "posting conspiracy theories"... ) It's as if stating a "conspiracy theory" is even worse than stating a lie.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Conspiracy theories - Todd Krieger 08:42:55 07/22/22 (4)
- "Fatal flaw" - geoffkait 09:23:48 07/22/22 (3)
- Off-Topic...... - Todd Krieger 10:29:09 07/22/22 (2)
- Conclusions of 2nd jfk investigation Report - geoffkait 11:28:39 07/22/22 (0)
- Exhibit #1 - geoffkait 11:17:33 07/22/22 (0)