In Reply to: Big-wiring and Cambridge Audio CXN network streamer posted by hesslemount@yahoo.com on May 6, 2017 at 03:19:20:
B&W is notorious for efective bi-wiring, since their engineering is focused on true bi-wire configurations vs. some makers who include the feature based on marketing. IMO, true bi-wiring should be considered standard and implemented as a choice by a listener unless there is a reason not offer a product with true bi-wire capability; such as a loudspeaker with a 1st order crossover or perhaps 'precision voicing' based on elimination of variables that a set of unpredictable bi-wire cables might present, or perhaps other issues designers might address. Otherwise, there is do downside to true-bi-wiring other than the added expense including bi-wire cabling. my 2 cents
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Big-wiring and Cambridge Audio CXN network streamer - Duster 17:29:02 05/08/17 (3)
- RE: Big-wiring and Cambridge Audio CXN network streamer - hesslemount@yahoo.com 03:40:51 05/09/17 (1)
- RE: Big-wiring and Cambridge Audio CXN network streamer - Duster 11:23:38 05/09/17 (0)
- RE: Big-wiring and Cambridge Audio CXN network streamer - hesslemount@yahoo.com 00:50:17 05/09/17 (0)