In Reply to: RE: good but . posted by Pjay on February 23, 2012 at 11:12:30:
I added the price on the featured ads, that's easy and we'll add a manufacture year to the db.
On the loading, is that on listing pages like this one below? I am using thumbnails, but they were created for the item listings and are 150 pixels. For that page, I just used the browser to scale them to 40 pixels. The thought being that we'd settle on a size and then look at the bandwidth issues.
Looking at image sizes, I agree, even thumbs at 150 pixels add up. At 15-20KB each, 100 of then could add up to 2MB or extra data. Since image sizes are logarithmic, resizing them to 40 pixels could reduce the data by nearly 16X, or down to 125kb which would be worth doing.
The main page and item listing pages aren't as bad, are they?
-Rod
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: good but . - Rod M 14:04:39 02/23/12 (4)
- RE: good but . - Pjay 16:12:36 02/23/12 (3)
- Thanks...just to be specific..... - Rod M 16:42:36 02/23/12 (2)
- RE: Thanks...just to be specific..... - Pjay 17:34:49 02/23/12 (1)
- RE: Thanks...just to be specific..... - Rod M 17:55:02 02/23/12 (0)