In Reply to: Gee, that's a loaded question with an obvious answer while advertising your company posted by keith_d on April 7, 2011 at 11:12:37:
It was *not* a loaded question.The deal existed between the dealer and the customer if there was a deal at all. From what we see here, the deal was to do a trade in **if the customer is trading up the line**. That is a common practice in the industry.
However in this case the customer decided to modify the deal after the fact- no trade in at all, just buy my unit back, after a year a use, thank-you very much. Naturally the dealer did not go for it.
So then the customer wanted Wavelength to buy it, which is also ridiculous since the deal was not made with Wavelength at all, nor did Wavelength ever get **paid** full retail- Wavelength was only paid dealer cost. So its entirely unreasonable on the customer's part to expect that Wavelength would have to pay out on something like that.
Edits: 04/07/11
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I don't agree at all. - Ralph 12:50:37 04/07/11 (7)
- It's a loaded question: The manufacturer knows what you just posted - keith_d 20:04:30 04/07/11 (6)
- RE: It's a matter of instropection for me - Ralph 09:02:10 04/08/11 (5)
- Yet you did not post your (non) quandry here, did you? - keith_d 10:02:28 04/08/11 (4)
- RE: Yet you did not post your (non) quandry here, did you? - Ralph 10:55:22 04/08/11 (3)
- So you do think there is or could be a public relations aspect, after all - keith_d 21:36:18 04/08/11 (2)
- RE: So you do think there is or could be a public relations aspect, after all - Ralph 10:23:08 04/11/11 (1)
- Okay then, it was a loaded question - a question to which the answer was known full well ahead of time - keith_d 21:44:25 04/11/11 (0)