In Reply to: "safer"? posted by Plinko on May 3, 2007 at 08:02:29:
That's if you can let yourself face political incorrectness. Note too, were one allowed to remove one particular population segment from US stats, this country would look even better!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yes, "safer". Beatings, robberies, urchins etc. London is *far worse*. Lookee here (if you dare): - clarkjohnsen 08:13:33 05/03/07 (12)
- According to the US Department of Justice …….. - three_sox 00:39:38 05/04/07 (9)
- So do we have higher arrest and/or conviction rates? More drug "offenses"? All that is part of imprisonment. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:27:12 05/04/07 (1)
- Maybe you just like locking up your citizens for matters as trivial as Jay-walking? ……… - three_sox 17:41:03 05/04/07 (0)
- Re: According to the US Department of Justice …….. - Rob Doorack 05:00:51 05/04/07 (6)
- Let’s not get carried away here. A simple definition of being safe is “not being dead†……. - three_sox 06:53:32 05/04/07 (5)
- Re: Let’s not get carried away here. A simple definition of being safe is “not being dead†……. - kurt s 10:12:15 05/04/07 (2)
- Re: Let’s not get carried away here. A simple definition of being safe is “not being dead†……. - Rob Doorack 10:47:04 05/04/07 (1)
- I think I could stand living in Honolulu. nt - kurt s 13:27:25 05/04/07 (0)
- Re: Let’s not get carried away here. A simple definition of being safe is “not being dead†……. - Matts_ 07:51:00 05/04/07 (1)
- "Two separate murder rates." And we dared to say it! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:25:34 05/04/07 (0)
- hey, remember that slapping thing that was going on - Plinko 10:21:41 05/03/07 (1)
- "Flies in the face of conventional wisdom." Rather, in the face of *inculcated*, ah, wisdom. nt - clarkjohnsen 10:32:13 05/03/07 (0)