|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: A familiar theme...the end to high-end... posted by slapshot on April 23, 2007 at 11:01:30:
This is found towards the end of the article.If they had used a 50kHz sampling, people would have enjoyed their CDs a lot better. Using a low sampling rate or less bits is a form of compression which many don't seem to realize.
IMHO, the difference between 96/24 and 44.1/16 is greater than uncompressed 44.1/16 and a 256kbps MP3 file.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- ROFL : "When Philips and Sony first made the CD, they didn't cut any corners ..." - The Sound Guy 21:39:48 04/23/07 (4)
- Re: ROFL : "When Philips and Sony first made the CD, they didn't cut any corners ..." - Todd Krieger 02:03:54 04/24/07 (3)
- Re: ROFL : "When Philips and Sony first made the CD, they didn't cut any corners ..." - The Sound Guy 22:50:20 04/24/07 (0)
- So here's an interesting trend - Ralph 08:22:10 04/24/07 (1)
- The Problem With CD..... - Todd Krieger 13:49:34 04/24/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
