In Reply to: Wasn't the comparison between the WAV and the FLAC? posted by E-Stat on April 15, 2007 at 08:40:47:
Further down it states:"I did a file comparison of the .wav files I used prior to burning, using EAC, and from a data standpoint, the non-compressed .wav and the FLAC encoded/decoded .wav were identical!!"
I interpret this as burning 2 identical WAV files, one of which was a decompressed FLAC, the other straight rip from the CD. This interpretation was the basis for my comment.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- that was not my impression - tunenut 10:24:41 04/15/07 (6)
- Re: that was not my impression - Todd Krieger 15:18:45 04/15/07 (4)
- Thanks for the clarification - E-Stat 16:43:41 04/15/07 (0)
- I would encourage you to do some control testing as well - tunenut 15:45:51 04/15/07 (2)
- Don't even bother - Feanor 18:20:17 04/16/07 (0)
- Good Point..... - Todd Krieger 17:04:20 04/15/07 (0)
- Gotcha - E-Stat 11:24:20 04/15/07 (0)