I'm sorry, disregard previous post since - A.J.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Now This Is Really Interesting..... - Todd Krieger 05:15:31 04/14/07 (68)

Why CD-R? - The Sound Guy 02:23:55 04/16/07 (5)

Re: Why CD-R? - Todd Krieger 09:56:08 04/16/07 (4)

Re: Why CD-R? - The Sound Guy 02:29:50 04/17/07 (0)

Re: Why CD-R? - Dawnrazor 17:35:46 04/16/07 (2)

Re: Why CD-R? - Todd Krieger 05:50:53 04/17/07 (1)

Re: Why CD-R? - Dawnrazor 08:28:10 04/17/07 (0)

Re: Now This Is Really Interesting..... - BrassTeacher 15:48:41 04/15/07 (2)

Re: Now This Is Really Interesting..... - Todd Krieger 17:01:32 04/15/07 (1)

Re: Now This Is Really Interesting..... - BrassTeacher 17:18:30 04/15/07 (0)

What's interesting are your claims - J.Mac 15:45:07 04/15/07 (1)

Re: What's interesting are your claims - Todd Krieger 16:50:57 04/15/07 (0)

I had a similar experience with WMA lossless. - rick_m 17:33:42 04/14/07 (0)

Re: Now This Is Really Interesting..... - tunenut 15:04:49 04/14/07 (10)

But they're not - E-Stat 06:16:32 04/15/07 (9)

I know that - tunenut 08:30:00 04/15/07 (8)

Wasn't the comparison between the WAV and the FLAC? - E-Stat 08:40:47 04/15/07 (7)

that was not my impression - tunenut 10:24:41 04/15/07 (6)

Re: that was not my impression - Todd Krieger 15:18:45 04/15/07 (4)

Thanks for the clarification - E-Stat 16:43:41 04/15/07 (0)

I would encourage you to do some control testing as well - tunenut 15:45:51 04/15/07 (2)

Don't even bother - Feanor 18:20:17 04/16/07 (0)

Good Point..... - Todd Krieger 17:04:20 04/15/07 (0)

Gotcha - E-Stat 11:24:20 04/15/07 (0)

I'm not at all surprised - E-Stat 13:36:12 04/14/07 (2)

Re: I'm not at all surprised - Dawnrazor 20:45:18 04/14/07 (1)

Re: I'm not at all surprised - Todd Krieger 05:09:18 04/15/07 (0)

But FLAC is better than Apple Lossless - AbeCollins 10:24:52 04/14/07 (3)

With Brief Listening, I Have to Agree [nt] - Todd Krieger 12:24:44 04/14/07 (0)

The format doesn't dictate the sound - kjg 12:23:52 04/14/07 (1)

Correct: some people seem to be missing this point - Feanor 16:06:10 04/14/07 (0)

Also, do some - Jon L 10:09:25 04/14/07 (9)

Re: Also, do some - Todd Krieger 12:22:46 04/14/07 (8)

Caution about "ABX" function - Jon L 20:17:54 04/14/07 (7)

Re: Caution about "ABX" function - Todd Krieger 05:32:49 04/15/07 (0)

Re: Caution about "ABX" function - Dawnrazor 20:41:01 04/14/07 (5)

Re: Caution about "ABX" function - Todd Krieger 05:35:25 04/15/07 (4)

Re: Caution about "ABX" function - Dawnrazor 09:48:43 04/15/07 (1)

Re: Caution about "ABX" function - Todd Krieger 16:06:51 04/15/07 (0)

Winamp over Zoom player? - Jon L 08:01:27 04/15/07 (1)

Re: Winamp over Zoom player? - Todd Krieger 15:42:37 04/15/07 (0)

"[The files] were identical!!" Of course they were -- and therefore they MUST sound the same... right? nt - clarkjohnsen 10:02:44 04/14/07 (5)

Obviously. Bits is bits is bits, and 16 bits at 44.1 = perfect sound, so 24 bits = 50% better than perfect! [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:45:56 04/15/07 (1)

I get your drift... nt - clarkjohnsen 09:05:25 04/16/07 (0)

He was NOT listening to identical files, however - Feanor 16:13:21 04/14/07 (2)

Re: He was NOT listening to identical files, however - Todd Krieger 21:57:34 04/15/07 (1)

You did a file compare of the two .WAV files?? - Feanor 18:12:31 04/16/07 (0)

What audio player did you use to play the FLAC? - A.J. 06:28:35 04/14/07 (14)

I'm sorry, disregard previous post since - A.J. 06:58:49 04/14/07 (13)

I Will Add..... - Todd Krieger 12:09:11 04/14/07 (12)

Re: I Will Add..... - alan m. kafton 12:58:51 04/14/07 (11)

What Vincent Stated..... - Todd Krieger 13:32:58 04/14/07 (10)

Er, no - John Atkinson 14:40:55 04/14/07 (7)

"Data... on a CD-R... are... immune to disc reading problems." That's interesting! nt - clarkjohnsen 11:52:52 04/15/07 (4)

Re: "Data... on a CD-R... are... immune to disc reading problems." That's interesting! - John Atkinson 13:59:10 04/15/07 (3)

Your Explanation Raises a Question..... - Todd Krieger 14:57:17 04/16/07 (1)

Re: Your Explanation Raises a Question..... - John Atkinson 03:50:39 04/17/07 (0)

Got it! Thanks. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:06:31 04/16/07 (0)

This Misses the Point..... - Todd Krieger 03:01:13 04/15/07 (0)

Re: Er, no - Vincent VRS 18:33:47 04/14/07 (0)

Re: What Vincent Stated..... - Vincent VRS 14:08:52 04/14/07 (1)

Re: What Vincent Stated..... - Todd Krieger 03:04:11 04/15/07 (0)

Re: Now This Is Really Interesting.....Time-Slicing - theaudiohobby 05:47:35 04/14/07 (6)

Re: Now This Is Really Interesting.....Time-Slicing - Tuckers 13:56:17 04/14/07 (0)

Very Aware of That.... - Todd Krieger 12:06:12 04/14/07 (1)

If you concern is task switching... - E-Stat 06:06:23 04/15/07 (0)

Sure he does - E-Stat 08:45:53 04/14/07 (2)

Re: Sure he does - theaudiohobby 16:31:24 04/14/07 (1)

More specifically - E-Stat 19:43:20 04/14/07 (0)

Follow Ups

I'm sorry, disregard previous post since - A.J. 06:58:49 04/14/07 (13)

I Will Add..... - Todd Krieger 12:09:11 04/14/07 (12)

Re: I Will Add..... - alan m. kafton 12:58:51 04/14/07 (11)

What Vincent Stated..... - Todd Krieger 13:32:58 04/14/07 (10)

Er, no - John Atkinson 14:40:55 04/14/07 (7)

"Data... on a CD-R... are... immune to disc reading problems." That's interesting! nt - clarkjohnsen 11:52:52 04/15/07 (4)

Re: "Data... on a CD-R... are... immune to disc reading problems." That's interesting! - John Atkinson 13:59:10 04/15/07 (3)

Your Explanation Raises a Question..... - Todd Krieger 14:57:17 04/16/07 (1)

Re: Your Explanation Raises a Question..... - John Atkinson 03:50:39 04/17/07 (0)

Got it! Thanks. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:06:31 04/16/07 (0)

This Misses the Point..... - Todd Krieger 03:01:13 04/15/07 (0)

Re: Er, no - Vincent VRS 18:33:47 04/14/07 (0)

Re: What Vincent Stated..... - Vincent VRS 14:08:52 04/14/07 (1)

Re: What Vincent Stated..... - Todd Krieger 03:04:11 04/15/07 (0)