In Reply to: Re: no, it's not a catchphrase, it's a religious slur; rest of your post shows why you obviously don't practice law n/t posted by Matts_ on March 26, 2007 at 15:15:32:
I don't practice law, but I thought the whole point was that when there was some disagreement, one would prove his/her points by making cogent arguments. Not just by saying things like "it is so obvious you are wrong". DO Judges accept that kind of reason?Certainly you have many many arguments you can trod out for us?
Especially if it is so obvious why he got it wrong.
Or is it OK for someone to complain about a religous slur and then commit his own slur?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: no, it's not a catchphrase, it's a religious slur; rest of your post shows why you obviously don't practice law n/t - Dawnrazor 15:27:35 03/26/07 (1)
- Re: no, it's not a catchphrase, it's a religious slur; rest of your post shows why you obviously don't practice law n/t - Matts_ 20:24:03 03/26/07 (0)