I’m in the process of setting up a new home theater which will serve double-duty as my music setup. After much research into many different speaker designs I have come to a conclusion about replicating the sound of live music, discussed below in some detail. It's sort of a grenade tossed at present standard audio speaker designs. But will it explode or just fizzle? If it does, the sounds you hear are exploding box speakers.
Until recently it had been a puzzle to me why it was still generally easy to tell the difference between live music and reproduced music, even though the quality of the source material, amplifiers, and speakers has significantly improved from my young days with tubes and vinyl (subjectivist tube-and-LP loving audiophiles notwithstanding). Although audiophiles often go to great expense (including such snake oil products as magic power cords, HiFi fuses, and exotic cables) to strive to get ever more accurate music reproduction from their box speakers, there is still usually something lacking in the end result that prevents the music from sounding “liveâ€. Perhaps that’s part of the reason for the never ending pursuit of better fidelity, sometimes to ridiculous lengths. The listener is aware something is missing and thinks it’s some lack of fidelity, when perhaps it’s really just a lack of the live music ambience. They have a desire for this ambience, even if it’s not recognized as that, and the hope that it will somehow appear with the next small increment of improved fidelity, that fractional dB improvement in frequency response flatness or small percentage of distortion reduction or more power output or…. But, with typical box speakers, I now consider that a futile pursuit.After reading numerous reviews and articles about speakers, and in particular, information on The Audio Critic and Siegfried Linkwitz’s websites (which I consider to be two of best sources for accurate speaker information on the web), I believe I now understand the puzzle of the live music sound. To recreate (not just reproduce) the sound of live music in one’s home, high fidelity sound alone is not sufficient. Indeed, I suspect that one can probably have reduced fidelity and still perceive sound as live, though with the flaws in fidelity apparent, if the ambience clues are correct. (The optical analog of this is looking through a pair of smeared glasses. You perceive a real appearing, if blurred, image, even though it has low optical fidelity, because the 3D clues are still there.) The ear-brain uses reflected sounds to determine the structure of the sound in space and these have a characteristic pattern for live music. Speakers that recreate this best in a normal room appear to be those with a dipolar or omnipolar radiation pattern where the patterns are reasonably uniform up to at least 3 kHz. These generate the proper room reflections that are interpreted as having the character of the original music sound stage, giving that U-R-There feeling of live music. Of these two radiation patterns, the dipole would seem to be preferred for having less interaction with room acoustics, but as the Pluto speaker design by Mr. Linkwitz demonstrates, an omnipolar pattern can also be effective.
Only a few other available speakers exhibit these radiation patterns. Examples are the Magnepan dipolar planar speakers, the Orion dipolar speaker designed by Mr. Linkwitz, and the omnipolar Ohm Walsh Speakers. All are reported to give a wide, realistic sound stage (although the Magnepans are directional at higher frequencies due to their large flat radiating surface which tends to reduce their sweet spot).
The old Bose 901 Direct/Reflecting speaker dating from 1967 (amazingly still available from Bose) was on the right track, but generates too much reflection from 8 rear speakers and only 1 front speaker. Bose based the reflection percentage on concert hall acoustics, but with this value in a typical sized listening room with its much shorter reverberation times, the sound at the ear is overwhelmed with multiple reflections (think hitting a golf ball in a tile bathroom). This muddies the virtual sound stage. It’s apparent that if a dipolar or omnipolar radiation pattern works well with 50% of the radiation directed to the rear hemisphere then 89% is way too much.
Standard “monkey coffin†rectangular box speakers, large or small, with forward-firing dynamic drivers, have a frequency dependent radiation pattern. They radiate forward in a unipolar manner at higher frequencies and approach an omnipolar pattern at frequencies below a few hundred Hertz. Even if a box speaker reproduces the sound with perfect fidelity, the reflection versus frequency from its radiation pattern in a normal room is atypical of live music and this is readily recognized by the ear-brain as music from a box. It will never really sound like live music. Of course one can still enjoy such music, as we all do, even without the live music ambience, perhaps by learning to accept (or ignore) the box speaker radiation pattern. It’s a personal preference as to the importance of the live ambience to your music listening pleasure. But I suspect it may be more important than many people realize unless they’ve heard speakers that produce the effect. To me, it’s essential, since I believe the holy grail of high fidelity is recreating the essence of live music, not just the sound. Of course that eliminates all the loudspeakers made which exhibit the box radiation pattern. And that would seem a rather disconcerting conclusion for the many box speaker manufacturers and owners. It requires a new paradigm for them as to what constitutes the best way to recreate the sound of live music. Box speakers RIP.(For a related discussion see the Orion review and the subsequent Postscript comments in the Audio Critic website at http://theaudiocritic.com/blog/index.php?op=Default&postCategoryId=1&blogId=1
P.S. Based upon all this I have decided to buy six dipolar Magnepan MMG-W’s for my setup.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Why Doesn't It Sound Live? - crutschow 10:16:50 03/21/07 (75)
- It isn't Memorex ? - eds65gto 11:58:49 03/26/07 (0)
- Your room probably doesn't sound like a nightclub or auditorium WITH live music playing! - Richard BassNut Greene 09:18:26 03/22/07 (2)
- absolutely - richardl 12:10:55 03/22/07 (1)
- You thought you were agreeing with me but you actually contradicted my post! ... Hey I've been contradicted before! - Richard BassNut Greene 07:29:39 03/23/07 (0)
- it is meant to be a different experience!!!!! - jdouglas51 05:03:29 03/22/07 (2)
- Re: it is meant to be a different experience!!!!! - David Aiken 20:58:59 03/22/07 (0)
- Re: it is meant to be a different experience!!!!! - maabx 05:27:11 03/22/07 (0)
- Cuz, it's not Memorex® (nt) - kuma 22:11:50 03/21/07 (0)
- Audio Has Lots of Problems..... "Box Speakers" IMO Are Not One of Them...... - Todd Krieger 21:06:52 03/21/07 (5)
- "Such snake oil products as magic power cords." LOL! You ain't heard nuthin' yet! The rest of your essay however... - clarkjohnsen 08:35:49 03/22/07 (4)
- That "Snake Oil" Comment Is Not Mine..... - Todd Krieger 10:24:34 03/22/07 (3)
- My apologies! Although elsewhere, recently, you yourself denigrated AC cords. nt - clarkjohnsen 10:27:42 03/22/07 (2)
- OK, Clark, You Got Me..... - Todd Krieger 03:14:17 03/23/07 (1)
- I also won't ever let you get away with saying something like, "This disc is in the wrong polarity." nt - clarkjohnsen 08:31:54 03/23/07 (0)
- Fundamently microphones can't capture the "live" sound - vettracer 20:44:28 03/21/07 (0)
- I think you have discovered one of the secrets: the reverberant sound matters! - Duke 20:40:27 03/21/07 (0)
- Re: Why Doesn't It Sound Live? Dynamics - Tom Brennan 19:30:12 03/21/07 (1)
- Re: Why Doesn't It Sound Live? Dynamics - kerr 06:36:57 03/22/07 (0)
- Re: Why Doesn't It Sound Live? - JimL 17:23:45 03/21/07 (0)
- Re: Why Doesn't It Sound Live? - SBurton 17:07:31 03/21/07 (0)
- Sounding live - Donald North 16:17:14 03/21/07 (0)
- Re: Why Doesn't It Sound Live? - mauimusicman 15:40:52 03/21/07 (11)
- Yes! Classical recordings, too. - markrohr 04:02:34 03/22/07 (0)
- Agreed! But most music never existed in accoustic space. - clifff 17:15:39 03/21/07 (1)
- Re: Agreed! But most music never existed in accoustic space. - mauimusicman 19:51:16 03/22/07 (0)
- Bravo!! Excellent Post! - Presto 16:45:47 03/21/07 (6)
- Re: Bravo!! Excellent Post! - mauimusicman 19:53:11 03/22/07 (0)
- Re: Bravo!! Excellent Post! - Donald North 17:14:56 03/21/07 (4)
- Yabbut. - Presto 21:22:48 03/21/07 (3)
- Re: Yabbut. - Donald North 23:02:08 03/21/07 (2)
- I almost forgot - Donald North 23:19:33 03/21/07 (1)
- I did a neat little experiment once. - Presto 20:29:23 03/22/07 (0)
- How right you are... - getheleadout 16:11:14 03/21/07 (0)
- probably not going to happen soon - PSP 13:24:40 03/21/07 (5)
- Oh, no - I was not disagreeing Peter... - Presto 21:30:29 03/21/07 (0)
- What if we tried this. - Presto 14:09:42 03/21/07 (3)
- You may be looking down, but it doesn't sound "down"... - Steve Parry 16:15:57 03/21/07 (1)
- No no... I meant looking down UPON... :P - Presto 21:27:11 03/21/07 (0)
- Re: What if we tried this. - PSP 14:56:45 03/21/07 (0)
- And yet one more small correction - Schu 13:21:31 03/21/07 (0)
- I must say that you can have the scale, the dynamics, the time and phase coherency... - Steve Parry 12:55:53 03/21/07 (0)
- Where to start, sigh... - mkuller 12:44:47 03/21/07 (0)
- IMO the quality of the recording process to produce the software - lenw 12:41:11 03/21/07 (1)
- Re: IMO the quality of the recording process to produce the software - acres verde 13:30:51 03/21/07 (0)
- Stand next to a drum set being played someday and . . . - markrohr 12:38:30 03/21/07 (0)
- Scale, for one thing - Rob Doorack 12:14:27 03/21/07 (4)
- Re: Scale, for one thing - crutschow 12:56:58 03/21/07 (3)
- Re: Scale, for one thing - theaudiohobby 09:46:56 03/22/07 (0)
- Re: Scale, for one thing - Rob Doorack 06:15:20 03/22/07 (0)
- "…the perception of live music requires the ambience of live music…" - David Aiken 14:15:53 03/21/07 (0)
- Are you sure that's it? - sser2 12:11:34 03/21/07 (0)
- Re: Why Doesn't It Sound Live? - Dman 12:11:29 03/21/07 (3)
- Re: Why Doesn't It Sound Live? - MylesJ 12:45:48 03/23/07 (0)
- Cannot - Tom Brennan 23:53:57 03/21/07 (1)
- Re: Cannot - Dman 04:06:15 03/22/07 (0)
- A few comments. - M3 lover 12:09:35 03/21/07 (0)
- Re: Why Doesn't It Sound Live? - getheleadout 11:44:05 03/21/07 (0)
- A very thoughtful post, thank you, but let me quibble about "Box speakers RIP". - clarkjohnsen 10:35:42 03/21/07 (17)
- L.I.A.R. (No not you Clark - that stands for "listening in another room") - Duke 20:16:53 03/21/07 (5)
- I beg to differ slightly. I believe the way a speaker sounds outside a room... - clarkjohnsen 08:26:27 03/22/07 (4)
- Re: I beg to differ slightly. I believe the way a speaker sounds outside a room... - Duke 10:36:08 03/22/07 (3)
- So: You *are* Duke Lacrosse! Been in the news a lot lately, ain'tcha? - clarkjohnsen 10:24:22 03/23/07 (2)
- On the advice of my attorney... - Duke 14:34:01 03/23/07 (1)
- Hey, I just happened to start mistyping that... Had anyone else noticed the spoof before? nt - clarkjohnsen 10:38:22 03/24/07 (0)
- Re: A very thoughtful post, thank you, but let me quibble about "Box speakers RIP". - mauimusicman 15:43:22 03/21/07 (0)
- Re: A very thoughtful post, thank you, but let me quibble about "Box speakers RIP". - crutschow 11:20:45 03/21/07 (9)
- Re: A very thoughtful post, thank you, but let me quibble about "Box speakers RIP". - maabx 12:02:20 03/21/07 (5)
- Re: A very thoughtful post, thank you, but let me quibble about "Box speakers RIP". - morricab 03:41:01 03/22/07 (1)
- Re: A very thoughtful post, thank you, but let me quibble about "Box speakers RIP". - maabx 05:12:48 03/22/07 (0)
- Re: A very thoughtful post, thank you, but let me quibble about "Box speakers RIP". - David Aiken 23:33:09 03/21/07 (1)
- That's a point: They're suffering from near-field withdrawal symptoms and want as much of it as they can get! nt - clarkjohnsen 08:28:36 03/22/07 (0)
- That's another good point. nt - clarkjohnsen 12:39:18 03/21/07 (0)
- Houston, you have a problem. - clarkjohnsen 11:43:11 03/21/07 (2)
- Re: Houston, you have a problem. - crutschow 12:17:03 03/21/07 (1)
- Maybe I would be able to do that, but who cares? I close my eyes! What's left then, for an illusion? Sight or sound? nt - clarkjohnsen 12:20:48 03/21/07 (0)