Re: An "Absolute Test" ... are you familiar with Vansever's ... - PeAK

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - An "Absolute Test" for audibility of "Absolute Polarity" - PeAK 11:53:45 03/11/07 (18)

What Would Be Even Better Is..... - Todd Krieger 18:11:49 03/11/07 (10)

Re: ...Even Better ....some comments - PeAK 05:06:14 03/14/07 (0)

But PeAK has already told us that, while his system reveals polarity, the digital steps obscure it. So: What to do now? - clarkjohnsen 08:50:03 03/12/07 (4)

Provided Independent Qualification Shows Definite Listener Discernment of Absolute Polarity (No Guarantee).... - Todd Krieger 12:16:34 03/12/07 (3)

A non-Clarkian objection :-) - David Aiken 13:49:13 03/12/07 (1)

Valid points, all... - Djhymn 23:22:28 03/12/07 (0)

All very interesting... albeit problematical... - clarkjohnsen 12:26:44 03/12/07 (0)

Re: What Would Be Even Better Is..... - Steve Eddy 18:37:16 03/11/07 (3)

Good Point.... But.... - Todd Krieger 18:54:18 03/11/07 (2)

Re: Good Point.... But.... - graemme 01:58:47 03/13/07 (1)

Re: Verifying copy and some comments/additional guidelines - PeAK 06:26:50 03/13/07 (0)

Re: An "Absolute Test" for audibility of "Absolute Polarity" - Srajan Ebaen 12:57:35 03/11/07 (2)

Re: An "Absolute Test" ... are you familiar with Vansever's ... - PeAK 17:22:06 03/13/07 (0)

While I have the highest regard for Eduardo... - clarkjohnsen 13:15:07 03/11/07 (0)

I was gonna say (but you said it for me)... - clarkjohnsen 12:57:09 03/11/07 (2)

Re: I was gonna say (but you said it for me)... - the roofman 14:55:08 03/11/07 (1)

Not bad, not bad... nt - clarkjohnsen 08:46:16 03/12/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: An "Absolute Test" ... are you familiar with Vansever's ... - PeAK 17:22:06 03/13/07 (0)