Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

No, but I guess that you (and Sony) both do...

The new Perfect Vision (available online for free) had this to say:

With The Fifth Element, one of the
first Blu-ray discs to be released,
everyone expected a reference quality
title like the DVD. Instead,
enthusiasts were shocked to find
that the Blu-ray version of the movie
was mastered from a sub-par print
full of dirt and scratches—all clearly
visible when watching the disc.

Hmmm. Not a very auspicious beginning, eh?

And that's not all. Here's what they said about another popular title:

House of Flying Daggers, another
early Sony Pictures release, was
similarly pilloried for looking very
soft.

The track record isn't looking so good, is it? More from the same article:

Sony is now examining the
masters of all new titles to verify that
image quality is up to snuff before
approving the transfer; masters that are
found to be sub-par will be redone.
(Why the studio didn’t do this in the first
place remains a mystery.)

It doesn't really sound like they know what they are doing does it? Or maybe they just don't really have their hearts into it. One final quote from the article:

As for the ongoing complaints that
many Blu-ray movies look soft and have
more artifacts than HD DVD titles, video
guru Joe Kane points to a number of
contributing factors, including the way
film-to-video transfers are performed
and problems with the MPEG-2 codec
itself.

So maybe Blu-ray has some inherent problems. Maybe HD-DVD would be better. But in the end, it doesn't really matter because they will both flop in the general marketplace.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.