In Reply to: Re: Speculation posted by sser2 on February 20, 2007 at 12:20:20:
x
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Speculation - Bob Neill 09:23:26 02/20/07 (45)
- Should we go back to table radios? - Feanor 09:10:36 03/01/07 (0)
- If it were just the "space and air" thing, I 'd agree with you, Bob... - Jim Treanor 16:05:17 02/21/07 (1)
- Re: If it were just the "space and air" thing, I 'd agree with you, Bob... - Bob Neill 13:56:55 02/22/07 (0)
- A different speculation - David Aiken 12:01:30 02/21/07 (2)
- Re: A different speculation - Bob Neill 13:55:03 02/22/07 (1)
- You miss my point… - David Aiken 15:11:46 02/22/07 (0)
- I find that a higher resolution format (SACD) enhances... - lenw 11:34:36 02/21/07 (2)
- Re: I find that a higher resolution format (SACD) enhances... - Bob Neill 13:53:39 02/22/07 (1)
- SACD sounds more natural to me and less distracting - Dave Kingsland 17:17:59 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: Speculation - theaudiohobby 06:50:37 02/21/07 (3)
- ?????????? - Bob Neill 13:51:06 02/22/07 (2)
- Re: ?????????? - theaudiohobby 16:00:19 02/22/07 (1)
- I agee with you, TAH - Feanor 09:08:26 03/01/07 (0)
- I remember the initial ecstatic raves in Positive Feedback ... - Dave Pogue 04:23:41 02/21/07 (0)
- I find that SACD is more involving. - orpheus 23:20:59 02/20/07 (1)
- Re: I find that SACD is more involving. - Bob Neill 05:08:15 02/21/07 (0)
- Noise characteristics of the formats. - Al Sekela 14:24:44 02/20/07 (18)
- Re: Noise characteristics of the formats. - Peter Qvortrup 01:25:15 02/22/07 (15)
- Re: Noise characteristics of the formats. - Dave Kingsland 16:27:39 02/22/07 (1)
- Noise is Noise Or is It? - Peter Qvortrup 09:54:40 02/23/07 (0)
- This comes down to how we separate 'noise' and 'distortion.' - Al Sekela 10:30:25 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: Noise floor vs. uncorrelated noise - theaudiohobby 06:11:48 02/22/07 (11)
- Re: Noise floor vs. uncorrelated noise - Peter Qvortrup 01:48:27 02/23/07 (10)
- Re: Noise floor vs. uncorrelated noise - theaudiohobby 06:45:39 02/23/07 (5)
- Noise is Noise Or is It? - Peter Qvortrup 09:43:25 02/23/07 (4)
- Re: Noise is Noise Or is It? - Dave Kingsland 15:06:52 02/23/07 (3)
- Re: Noise is Noise Or is It? - Peter Qvortrup 09:18:13 02/27/07 (2)
- Thanks - Dave Kingsland 19:04:19 02/27/07 (1)
- Re: Thanks - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:51:08 02/28/07 (0)
- Re: Noise floor vs. uncorrelated noise - theaudiohobby 02:58:59 02/23/07 (3)
- Re: Noise floor vs. uncorrelated noise - morricab 04:14:29 02/23/07 (2)
- Re: Noise floor vs. uncorrelated noise - theaudiohobby 05:04:38 02/23/07 (1)
- Re: Noise floor vs. uncorrelated noise - morricab 13:39:16 02/23/07 (0)
- I Personally Agree With Your Assessment..... - Todd Krieger 02:19:03 02/21/07 (1)
- Re: I Personally Agree With Your Assessment..... - theaudiohobby 06:22:18 02/22/07 (0)
- The human brain upsample rate - Jade East 13:15:54 02/20/07 (0)
- Re: Speculation - MylesJ 12:46:49 02/20/07 (0)
- Re: Speculation - sser2 12:20:20 02/20/07 (1)
- Re: Richter. He's right; music is not about sound. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:02:29 02/21/07 (0)
- You've put your finger on a larger problem: the fixation - tinear 11:42:25 02/20/07 (0)
- Re: Speculation - Ted Smith 11:17:41 02/20/07 (0)
- I find the best redbooks, XRCD24s, to be more dynamic than sacds - Norm 11:06:22 02/20/07 (2)
- Re: I find the best redbooks, XRCD24s, to be more dynamic than sacds - racerguy 12:31:21 02/20/07 (1)
- Re: I find the best redbooks, XRCD24s, to be more dynamic than sacds - Norm 05:51:37 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Speculation - Quint 09:40:48 02/20/07 (1)
Follow Ups
- Re: Richter. He's right; music is not about sound. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:02:29 02/21/07 (0)