In Reply to: Test for Absolute Pitch posted by Todd Krieger on February 14, 2007 at 04:30:01:
I personally have never found ET other than VERY tricksy and non-intuitive, even dare I say it, unmusical!My old Choirmaster said this was just FINE really, I'd manage to get past it, and made me a 'Leader' and eventually the DHC! all are RSCM terms! *
440Hz is also an arbitrary scaling or classification of the progression of pitches. HIP performers change A with the weather it seems.
All classifications are arbitrary JBTW, but in this case this test is certainly ethnocentric - to modern western 'serious/fine music' - training.
A narrow and standardised version of that, as well.
Snap! - about the choristers who couldn't cope with 'notching it up a third or so' or down a 5th! GOOD one Ted, quite apt!
and owyergoin' maaate, orright!?
in summary - fine relative pitch acuity is IMO far more REAL a phenomenon or human musical trait, and far more usefully to tet for, than is confirming someone's commitment to a laid-down / learned arbitrary pattern and its LIST.
And, I didn't actually / really - LIKE - the sound of the notes, moving quickly to thinking about the above points.
Only then realising that I didn't LIKE the timbre at all.the person playings touch? Grand pianos in general? ;-)!!!!, miking, my 'phones / PC , low sampling rates?
Really, who gives a damn!
That is how I see it!
WarmestTimbo in Oz
The Skyptical Mensurer and Audio ScroungerAnd gladly would he learn and gladly teach - Chaucer. ;-)!
'Still not saluting.'
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I think this is a fundamenatlly misocceived conception of what 'fine PITCH acuity actually IS - Timbo in Oz 18:23:19 02/16/07 (0)