In Reply to: New Scientist posted by John N on February 16, 2007 at 11:39:14:
That's why it's up to the individual to test for themeselves in their own environment....Something that scared, naysayers, around here fail to understand. That many historical scientific revelations start with the curious who say something akin to: "gee, that explanation doesn't sound right, let me test this for myself."
We live in unique environs, we like different types of music, we prefer different kinds of flavored sound playback devices, we hear differently.
No product will have the same level of efficacy with so many variables, no product can meet the unreasonable standards of "proof" that some unreasonable and intolerant "certainty freaks" here espouse....Watching the reel as it comes to a close,
Brutally taking it's time,
People who change for no reason at all,
It's happening all of the time.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Too many variables to yield uniform results - Sordidman 12:05:26 02/16/07 (5)
- Slight correction:Too many *interdependent* variables. nt - clarkjohnsen 10:46:02 02/17/07 (0)
- Re: Too many variables to yield uniform results - Jim Willis 16:01:45 02/16/07 (3)
- hundreds of thousands of possible sets of amps/speakers/sources - Sordidman 17:23:36 02/16/07 (2)
- Huh? How do various setups enter into this? - Rick W 12:42:01 02/17/07 (0)
- No joke, he is a *serious* dude! nt - clarkjohnsen 10:46:57 02/17/07 (0)