Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - An uniformed hypothesis - Bob Neill 06:40:53 08/07/06 (67)

• An unnaturally crisp quality in digital audio may be caused - Al Sekela 19:01:14 08/08/06 (0)
• In other words, in twenty-five words or less how does digital technology work? - Soundmind 04:35:14 08/08/06 (1)
• Would you care to elaborate?... - Wellfed 08:51:01 08/08/06 (0)
• Hmmmmmm… - David Aiken 01:41:26 08/08/06 (1)
• Regrettably, by the time a CD signal gets to the speakers it's too late for them to help. Unless of course... - clarkjohnsen 07:59:15 08/08/06 (0)
• Sound waves - analogue and digital reproduction - Frihed89 00:51:46 08/08/06 (0)
• ignorance not an entirely bad thing - jeme 18:16:12 08/07/06 (0)
• So what uniform were you wearing when you formed this hypothesis? - Big Dave 16:38:40 08/07/06 (7)
• Re: So what uniform were you wearing when you formed this hypothesis? - Bob Neill 18:26:42 08/07/06 (0)
• Re: So what uniform were you wearing when you formed this hypothesis? - Bob Neill 17:33:26 08/07/06 (5)
• Video Monitors - Tuckers 12:33:17 08/09/06 (0)
• Pssst, Bob.... - Neil49 17:49:30 08/07/06 (3)
• Re: Pssst, Bob.... - Big Dave 19:01:07 08/07/06 (1)
• I noticed it. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:00:45 08/08/06 (0)
• Oh duh. - Bob Neill 18:25:44 08/07/06 (0)
• Re: An uniformed hypothesis - Tuckers 16:00:18 08/07/06 (7)
• "Digital audio recording is a purer representation than a digital photograph." Hmm... - clarkjohnsen 07:57:04 08/08/06 (6)
• Re: "Digital audio recording is a purer representation than a digital photograph." Hmm... - Tuckers 11:39:52 08/08/06 (5)
• Sorry to have to tell you this, but... - clarkjohnsen 07:39:42 08/09/06 (4)
• How did you get from there to here? - Tuckers 12:07:22 08/09/06 (3)
• The fact remains, neither digital enlargements nor CDs very well represent reality. - clarkjohnsen 08:25:24 08/10/06 (2)
• Re: The fact remains, neither digital enlargements nor CDs very well represent reality. - Tuckers 14:40:39 08/10/06 (1)
• No, not Kodachrome! You know perfectly well... nt - clarkjohnsen 09:24:35 08/14/06 (0)
• too broad a brush - tunenut 15:03:14 08/07/06 (4)
• Re: too broad a brush - Bob Neill 15:59:18 08/07/06 (3)
• Re: too broad a brush - tunenut 18:23:41 08/07/06 (1)
• Re: too broad a brush - Bob Neill 18:34:00 08/07/06 (0)
• Re: too broad a brush - Tuckers 16:11:43 08/07/06 (0)
• "unnaturally crisp quality of digital sound" can be eliminated - Richard BassNut Greene 13:52:51 08/07/06 (33)
• Re: "unnaturally crisp quality of digital sound" can be eliminated - Soundmind 04:51:36 08/08/06 (18)
• 'Nothing is news', is not a salient point. - soulfood 07:56:25 08/08/06 (0)
• Concert Hall at home -- high frequency rolloff is a dynamic event? - Richard BassNut Greene 07:54:19 08/08/06 (16)
• Re: Concert Hall at home -- high frequency rolloff is a dynamic event? - Dave Kingsland 09:38:10 08/08/06 (15)
• Re: Concert Hall at home -- high frequency rolloff is a dynamic event? - Soundmind 15:00:40 08/08/06 (13)
• Re: Concert Hall at home -- high frequency rolloff is a dynamic event? - theaudiohobby 04:37:33 08/09/06 (5)
• Insofar as recordings are concerned - Soundmind 06:14:18 08/09/06 (4)
• Boy you need to listen to better systems... Perhaps even multichannel [nt] - Ted Smith 11:00:36 08/09/06 (3)
• And you need to listen to live music..in concert halls, and not in the front row either [nt] - Soundmind 15:06:38 08/09/06 (2)
• I do [nt] - Ted Smith 15:18:58 08/09/06 (1)
• I now pronounce you man and wife - Richard BassNut Greene 13:16:29 08/10/06 (0)
• Yes, it's a matter of personal preference - Dave Kingsland 20:31:05 08/08/06 (0)
• Re: Concert Hall at home -- high frequency rolloff is a dynamic event? - Bob Neill 15:34:43 08/08/06 (5)
• Re: Concert Hall at home -- high frequency rolloff is a dynamic event? - Soundmind 19:27:09 08/08/06 (4)
• Now that's some wisdom! - Tuckers 14:49:36 08/10/06 (0)
• Reproductions are not real. - soulfood 09:15:39 08/09/06 (2)
• Re: Reproductions are not real. - Soundmind 15:26:01 08/09/06 (1)
• A reproduction is "completely short". - soulfood 16:32:36 08/09/06 (0)
• Re: Same here - theaudiohobby 14:50:46 08/08/06 (0)
• Re: "unnaturally crisp quality of digital sound" can be eliminated - mauimusicman 03:26:45 08/08/06 (1)
• My experience with Sheffield is that eliminating the tape recorder was a good thing to do - Richard BassNut Greene 07:35:25 08/08/06 (0)
• Re: "unnaturally crisp quality of digital sound" can be eliminated - morricab 14:28:53 08/07/06 (11)
• Right on the money. My experience too. - Sean 20:24:56 08/07/06 (7)
• Repeat: Re: Right on the money. My experience too. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:54:37 08/08/06 (0)
• Re: Right on the money. My experience too. - morricab 04:17:50 08/08/06 (4)
• Eliminate the harmonic distortion and surface noise using CDs (versus vinyl), and you WILL have leaner sound - Richard BassNut Greene 07:29:24 08/08/06 (3)
• Re: Eliminate the harmonic distortion and surface noise using CDs (versus vinyl), and you WILL have leaner sound - morricab 01:19:42 08/09/06 (2)
• This really IS the debate, isn't it??? - Feanor 07:36:21 08/10/06 (1)
• Re: This really IS the debate, isn't it??? - morricab 08:05:13 08/11/06 (0)
• Re: Right on the money. My experience too. - mauimusicman 03:28:57 08/08/06 (0)
• "The digital recording always sounded brighter" - Richard BassNut Greene 14:56:51 08/07/06 (2)
• Re: "The digital recording always sounded brighter" - morricab 04:26:29 08/08/06 (0)
• Re: "The digital recording always sounded brighter" - soulfood 16:21:58 08/07/06 (0)
• Re: An uniformed hypothesis - Steve Eddy 12:15:01 08/07/06 (0)
• Myself, long ago and unlike many, I was never a fan of the Trinatron TV tube. - clarkjohnsen 10:54:46 08/07/06 (1)
• Proving once again your incredibly poor judgement - Soundmind 04:24:07 08/08/06 (0)
• Precision, rate and noise... - Sordidman 08:38:09 08/07/06 (0)
• I have a more basic hypothesis - soulfood 07:58:52 08/07/06 (0)

Follow Ups

• No, not Kodachrome! You know perfectly well... nt - clarkjohnsen 09:24:35 08/14/06 (0)