|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: NAD L73 posted by RibbonSpeakers.net on April 28, 2006 at 20:16:12:
unreliable. at least all 3 NAD products i've owned eventually turned to crap. you'll likely get many pros and cons here. notice that few equipment manufacturers are so polarizing, not necessarily for poor sound, but poor build quality and poor customer service. an inexpensive reciever does no good if its repaired 3x in a year, despite if it sounds good.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- UNRELIABLE - blackwax@mac.com 21:39:29 04/28/06 (5)
- The NAD reliability question-the good and the bad - lancelot 18:41:14 04/29/06 (0)
- Oh really? - TheMadMilkman 23:11:38 04/28/06 (3)
- so you're one of the lucky few...I've been burned twice - EdM 06:32:04 04/29/06 (2)
- Re: so you're one of the lucky few...I've been burned twice - David Aiken 14:17:57 04/29/06 (0)
- Have A NAD 3155, 25 Years Old, Never Repaired Once (nt) - "Red" 11:50:43 04/29/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
