In Reply to: RodM. . . posted by patentguy on February 18, 2000 at 08:11:23:
Sorry, I had read some of the technical stuff and there's some good information there. Honestly I didn't read the whole thing, but now I see the sparks.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: RodM. . . - Rod M 13:50:12 02/18/00 (15)
- Re: RodM. . . - Mart 09:43:02 02/19/00 (14)
- You mean, "it can" - jj 14:04:41 02/19/00 (13)
- Re: You mean, "it can" - Mart 14:08:05 02/19/00 (12)
- There's no such THING, Mart. That's where you err. - jj 14:18:54 02/19/00 (11)
- so by infinite duration - Mart 14:35:10 02/19/00 (10)
- The example is not recursive... - jj 14:42:47 02/19/00 (9)
- care to design one? - Mart 14:56:17 02/19/00 (8)
- Design what? - jj 15:55:09 02/19/00 (7)
- Re: Design what? - Mart 18:39:24 02/19/00 (6)
- Ahhh.... - jj 19:35:44 02/19/00 (5)
- who doesn't cheap out? - Mart 22:42:19 02/19/00 (4)
- Sorry, I never name specific equipment - jj 10:10:14 02/20/00 (3)
- Re: Sorry, I never name specific equipment - Mart 18:34:57 02/20/00 (2)
- Hmm.... - jj 19:39:17 02/20/00 (1)
- very true... - Mart 20:46:42 02/20/00 (0)