|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: You attack thoughts not in my posts (why waste bandwidth?) = maybe you can't refute what I actually write ? posted by Richard BassNut Greene on March 21, 2005 at 10:34:29:
>Blind auditions of speakers are a good idea too, but the logistics of blind speaker auditions are very difficult.>Listening to anything blind and doing it correctly to control all of the variables is very difficult. Most are poorly controlled and are pretty meaningless.
Listening blind and listening sighted provide you with different types of errors. Blind listening gives you errors of omission - small audible differences disappear everything tends to sound the same. Sighted listening provides the possibility of errors of commission - you may hear things because of your biases that aren't really there. Neither is perfect.
So you dodged my question - if you listen to speakers sighted, how do you know which things you hear are real and which are imagined?
Inquiring minds want to know.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Call the wahhh-mbulance... - mkuller 12:08:06 03/21/05 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
