Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Is burn-in on electronics real? - mdl 07:19:32 03/12/05 (67)

• Burn in is real for all electronics - njjohn 19:43:54 03/12/05 (4)
• Re: Burn in is real for all electronics - Peter 05:09:27 03/13/05 (0)
• "Look, colors fade on cars over the years." Is that a good thing??? - nt - ungabunga 20:23:06 03/12/05 (2)
• A better example would be 0-60 time. It's often shorter after the engine breaks in. [nt] - David Spear 23:01:56 03/13/05 (1)
• Re: A better example would be 0-60 time. It's often shorter after the engine breaks in. [nt] - middleground 16:11:04 03/14/05 (0)
• Why is it that we see only reports of improvement, never degradation, during the "break-in" period? - rkw 10:06:37 03/12/05 (6)
• it's all a matter of time scale - Alex S 19:37:09 03/12/05 (0)
• One thing that gets much worse over time... - Charles Hansen 10:31:38 03/12/05 (4)
• I wonder . . . - markrohr 09:14:13 03/13/05 (1)
• Re: I wonder . . . - jea48 10:00:09 03/13/05 (0)
• Excellent! - Alex S 19:21:08 03/12/05 (0)
• Hunh! nt - clarkjohnsen 12:46:14 03/12/05 (0)
• Re: Is burn-in on electronics real? - AmirB 10:01:22 03/12/05 (0)
• It clearly does for some components - Caymus 09:36:25 03/12/05 (0)
• So you want replies to convince you that break-in doesn't really exist? - Grover 09:31:31 03/12/05 (2)
• Something like that :-) - mdl 12:07:05 03/12/05 (1)
• So I've been thinking about break-in of opamps. - Grover 18:53:11 03/12/05 (0)
• Absolutely - Sherlock 09:28:20 03/12/05 (2)
• " I find about 40-50 hours to be sufficient....". Not many Black Gate capacitors in these components, then!...... - feet's too big 11:37:11 03/12/05 (1)
• Re: " I find about 40-50 hours to be sufficient....". Not many Black Gate capacitors in these components, then!...... - Sherlock 09:00:14 03/13/05 (0)
• Re: Is burn-in on electronics real? - jea48 09:03:12 03/12/05 (0)
• Nope, here's why.... - hifi heretic 08:31:03 03/12/05 (38)
• Not true about manufacturers - MarkgM 11:20:50 03/13/05 (10)
• Which part? - clifff 11:42:11 03/13/05 (9)
• Re: Which part? - MarkgM 12:06:33 03/13/05 (8)
• I was questioning your logic. - clifff 12:28:40 03/13/05 (7)
• I'll tell you what I did - MarkgM 13:04:53 03/13/05 (6)
• "I watched the amount of break-up occuring in the woofers!" - clifff 13:13:13 03/13/05 (5)
• Re: "I watched the amount of break-up occuring in the woofers!" - MarkgM 13:32:38 03/13/05 (4)
• What are you studying in College? - clifff 13:40:35 03/13/05 (3)
• Still having communications problems? - MarkgM 14:27:34 03/13/05 (2)
• I am such a sadist! - clifff 14:41:16 03/13/05 (1)
• "Obviously" You read about as well into me as I read into you - poorly - MarkgM 14:57:54 03/13/05 (0)
• Re: Nope, here's why.... - Sherlock 09:01:52 03/13/05 (2)
• huh? - hifi heretic 11:21:17 03/13/05 (1)
• Re: huh? - Sherlock 15:29:47 03/13/05 (0)
• Case closed? Hardly, get a clue! (nt) - Peter 05:12:24 03/13/05 (0)
• Re: Nope, here's why....Thats rediculous ! ! ! - Mike Mount 20:49:44 03/12/05 (2)
• a totally irrelevant analogy. - hifi heretic 03:10:49 03/13/05 (1)
• Re: a totally irrelevant analogy. - jea48 10:16:06 03/13/05 (0)
• Re: Nope, here's why.... - mauimusicman 20:02:42 03/12/05 (0)
• Here we go again - Dave Pogue 09:05:43 03/12/05 (17)
• Re: Here we go again - hifi heretic 09:21:07 03/12/05 (16)
• Re: Here we go again - mauimusicman 20:04:05 03/12/05 (0)
• Re: Here we go again - Dave Pogue 09:40:13 03/12/05 (4)
• Or - sjb 13:40:58 03/12/05 (0)
• 2 little kids arguing over silly things - nt - ungabunga 13:10:49 03/12/05 (2)
• couldn't that be said of what generally goes on here at AA? - hifi heretic 14:22:28 03/12/05 (1)
• Re: Obviously NOT in your case! (nt) - Mike Mount 20:53:04 03/12/05 (0)
• Why does somebody ... - Dave Kingsland 09:34:38 03/12/05 (9)
• May YOU should try... - TeddiJackEddie 06:55:44 03/13/05 (1)
• OK, so I haven't tried the XR70 - Dave Kingsland 08:08:32 03/13/05 (0)
• Re: Why does somebody ... - steve b 13:39:35 03/12/05 (0)
• not true... - hifi heretic 09:45:48 03/12/05 (5)
• OK, so no SACD, but still... - Dave Kingsland 11:59:58 03/12/05 (4)
• Re: OK, so no SACD, but still... - hifi heretic 13:40:10 03/12/05 (2)
• Re: OK, so no SACD, but still... - Peter 05:18:21 03/13/05 (0)
• Re: OK, so no SACD, but still... - mauimusicman 20:14:59 03/12/05 (0)
• Excellent post. nt - Fiddler 12:34:12 03/12/05 (0)
• Re: Nope, here's why.... - Gmood1 09:03:00 03/12/05 (0)
• Re: Is burn-in on electronics real? - AbeCollins 08:29:28 03/12/05 (0)
• Re: Is burn-in on electronics real? - Andrew chester 08:26:16 03/12/05 (0)
• Re: Is burn-in on electronics real? - Craiger56@aol.com 07:55:51 03/12/05 (0)
• Re: Is burn-in on electronics real? - Soundmind 07:45:48 03/12/05 (1)
• Re: Is burn-in on electronics real? - middleground 17:51:24 03/12/05 (0)
• Re: Is burn-in on electronics real? - middleground 07:35:43 03/12/05 (1)
• Re: Is burn-in on electronics real? - Mike Mount 21:03:45 03/12/05 (0)

Follow Ups

• Hunh! nt - clarkjohnsen 12:46:14 03/12/05 (0)