In Reply to: Monster Cable v Monster Vintage, I tried to make some back-channel peace posted by Ray Kimber on February 12, 2005 at 09:05:53:
Ray's repeated posting may seem like some to be mudslinging. Hell, I wouldn't really mind if it were. Monster deserves every bit of destructive action this site can muster. But I think it's more that Ray feels like I do (and several other cablewinders, little guys like myself and steve eddy) and finds it personally quite distasteful, as well as reflecting poorly upon the business in general. To not temper business practice with any sort of ethics... leaves a bad taste in everybodys mouth. And if you get sushi poisoning, you tend to not eat ANY fish for a while. By extension, we get painted with the same mottled, soulless brush as the monster goons. Which makes their disgusting legal practice all the more bothersome to the other ripoff, overpricing, scumbag cableguys like us.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- How much is too much? - badman 19:51:46 02/12/05 (0)