In Reply to: Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? posted by Peter Daniel on July 8, 2003 at 13:38:50:
>>I am still not sure how the others will accept the fact that the amps look indeed, sort of similar,==Back when audio was "box driven"(could still be), many mfg'rs would offer a *black* version, of their *silver* version.
The AMP-1 looks to be the *silver* (w-gold knobs)version of the 47labs product. I know and understand the differences in the amps. Without judging the sonics, the amps -for all inents and purposes- look exceedingly similar. To the point of distraction. And it is kinda distracting.
>>To some who lived with GainCard for years it may look so, but for somebody seeing both amps for the first time, the appeal may be completely different.
==With such a simple platform as a gainclone, there exists a great opportunity for aesthetic enhancement, unique to existing designs. The 2 box channell and end caps structure, while not *the same* only serves to dilute the 47Labs original design methodology. In effect devalueing BOTH products simultaneously, ultimately. So now we should expect yet even more very similar designs?
TC
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - tcain 14:00:23 07/08/03 (5)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter Daniel 16:00:24 07/08/03 (4)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - tcain 18:15:59 07/08/03 (3)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter Daniel 18:51:30 07/08/03 (2)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - tcain 19:03:35 07/08/03 (1)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter DAniel 19:23:40 07/08/03 (0)