In Reply to: Stereophile: Those that forget the past.... posted by Sean on May 23, 2003 at 15:58:09:
I freely acknowledge that your post has excited in me a negative reaction which may or may not be justified. I may be (I fear) as well known for my sharp wit and ready temper as for anything else. Part of this reaction comes from the inference I have drawn, which is that you seem to think that Stereophile and its writer have been taken in by a re-tread design, and by further inference, that they lack adequate knowledge of the history of the technology they cover.However, I question how carefully you read the article in question, as distinct from looking at a picture. While horizontally-dispersing speakers have been known at least since the 1930s, and Stewart Hegeman's work was in the 1960s, I believe that the B&O speaker incorporates developments which are indeed useful, novel, non-obvious, and are not merely cumulative of prior advancements in the art.
Specifically, what David Moulton and his collaborator developed--and which was I believe awarded a patent by the US Patent and Trademark Office--is an elliptical waveguide which in fact imparts a rather strong directivity, such that on-axis and power response are unusually similar.
I will cc David on this so he can take part as he sees fit. But to the extent your post implies that Stereophile is guilty of lazy or sloppy reporting, I strenuously object, and suggest you dig a little deeper. Nobody is perfect, but I can tell you from first-hand experience, that at Stereophile the pressure is always on to get it right.
Cordially,
John Marks
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sorry, I believe you are quite wrong - John Marks 16:48:33 05/23/03 (24)
- I thought you moved to Karachi? - Chris Garrett 15:36:37 05/24/03 (3)
- Not Karachi; Kingston; the other Kingston (not Basingstoke, either) - John Marks 15:58:42 05/24/03 (2)
- Eh? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:12:01 05/25/03 (0)
- Well, either way, glad to have you back......... - Chris Garrett 18:51:19 05/24/03 (0)
- Let me clarify some points.... - Sean 21:14:10 05/23/03 (11)
- "...On the Shoulder of Giants" attribution - paul_s 12:09:56 05/24/03 (0)
- Re: Let me clarify some points.... - mikenificent1 07:50:49 05/24/03 (1)
- Why don't you try reading this... - Sean 09:04:26 05/24/03 (0)
- Given your strong feelings about giving credit where it's due... - David Spear 22:06:58 05/23/03 (7)
- actually... - paul_s 12:16:40 05/24/03 (2)
- It seems that Bernie was just another latecomer... - David Spear 00:11:05 05/25/03 (1)
- Where were you when Merton needed this information? - paul_s 13:54:32 05/25/03 (0)
- Thanks for clarifying that Dave... - Sean 22:14:34 05/23/03 (3)
- Heck, Isaac Newton probably snagged the line from somebody else! ;-) [nt] - David Spear 22:19:44 05/23/03 (2)
- He did. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 04:15:33 05/24/03 (1)
- LOL!!! SO AWESOME..................(nt) - Sordidman 11:15:00 05/24/03 (0)
- Re: Sorry, I believe you are quite wrong - hahax 20:06:58 05/23/03 (6)
- Your instincts may be right! - John Marks 08:30:28 05/24/03 (0)
- Re: Sorry, I believe you are quite wrong - mikenificent1 07:56:20 05/24/03 (2)
- Wrong once again... - Sean 17:04:39 05/24/03 (0)
- Re: Sorry, I believe you are quite wrong - hahax 09:50:41 05/24/03 (0)
- I may be quite wrong but... - David Aiken 00:40:26 05/24/03 (0)
- Re: Sorry, I believe you are quite wrong - Sean 21:20:05 05/23/03 (0)
- Re: Sorry, I believe you are quite wrong - Dan Banquer 17:42:08 05/23/03 (0)