Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Re: OK, guys...

208.165.108.18

This thread has erupted into a flame war. I came here hoping that this would not happen. At any rate I have done amplifier comparisions, and sadly I have not heard a difference. Perhaps my hearing is truly poor? The ironic thing was I switched between my normal Technics reciever and a cheap Sony boombox. I would have expected a difference, but did not notice anything, except on transiants and at high volumes, which is to be expected since I was comparing a cheap amplifier vs a midrange one - the technics reciever allowed for more clean power output. Now, I know my equipment isnt exactly "high end" but I have asked several people if what I was hearing was valid or not, and they said it should. Two of which were electrical engineers and know about amplifier design. Why can't anyone explain to me the differences between two amplifiers? I mean, get as technical as you want, why one will sound better than another - and the difference actually be audible. I have heard no valid reasons as of yet why I should believe there is a sound quality difference at low power between a cheap reciever and a 10 thousand dollar amplifier. I hear over and over, that I should trust my ears. I find that to be extremely arrogant to assume that your ears are better at distinguishing sound than testing equipment. Humans cannot hear a difference between an MP3 file encoded at 256kbits from the original source CD - how are they going to hear the most minute differences between amplifiers?


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.