In Reply to: You wrote: posted by Kal Rubinson on June 13, 2002 at 11:52:49:
I know it is Stereophile's policy to report failures; because I've read the policy. I was not recognizing a difference between a magazine's policy and an individual reviewer's practice.What I meant was -- in the terms you use -- it doesn't have to be Stereophile's policy to report those sorts of failures and malfunctions. That's a self-imposed obligation (which I commend, BTW, and which somewhat gives the lie to "it suits me's" argument that you're all in the pockets of the manufacturers).
Now if I could just get your mag's circulation department to send me the damn magazine, I'd be doing good!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Sure, Kal - Bruce from DC 14:18:22 06/13/02 (0)