In Reply to: Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] posted by John Atkinson on June 13, 2002 at 07:39:12:
I didn't reply to your post because it really didn't relate to the substance of what I was saying, unfortunately, you pop up to defend Stereophile, but unknown to you, Stereophile isn't the centre of the universe.Your comments are very misleading. obviously Stereophile works on some fairly long lead times. The reviews you list were in many cases already at the printer, or in earlier stages of preparation, when the bankruptcy took place. Quoting the issue dates is misleading, as you are well aware that some of those issues were finalized before the bankruptcy was known.
If you really want to be factual, why don't you search your archives and post here a listing of monthly SF advertising revenues correlated against reviews. that would be much more interesting.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Robert H. 14:15:08 06/13/02 (0)