In Reply to: Re: Refill!!!!! posted by Charles Hansen on June 11, 2002 at 16:18:54:
UUmm,Isn't Robert Parker the 'Jazz in digital stereo' guy from Orstraya, down here. Recordings issued by the BEEB and ABC too.
No?
timbo
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - TAS, Stereophile Ad Practices and other issues - hexenboden 14:09:44 06/11/02 (46)
- Re: TAS, Stereophile Ad Practices and other issues - Ralph 10:37:58 06/12/02 (0)
- Re: TAS, Stereophile Ad Practices and other issues - Char 20:12:45 06/11/02 (0)
- you are so naive ... - porky_pig_jr 18:07:44 06/11/02 (2)
- I hope I stay that way (nt) - hexenboden 06:51:25 06/12/02 (0)
- Well spoken, Pig. (nt) - SalD 00:12:44 06/12/02 (0)
- TAS won't unsub you from their mailing list - what more do you need to know? (nt) - doesnt_suit_me 17:26:56 06/11/02 (0)
- I agree with you about how TAS has changed (nt) - GPB 17:15:55 06/11/02 (1)
- I don't - Dave Pogue 17:50:49 06/11/02 (0)
- Advertising is EVERYTHING to magazines - Guy de Sac 14:46:27 06/11/02 (0)
- Unfortunately... - Budrew 14:33:30 06/11/02 (5)
- Re: Unfortunately... - Charles Hansen 16:16:55 06/11/02 (4)
- So, is it the manufacturers... - Budrew 17:11:44 06/11/02 (2)
- Re: So, is it the manufacturers... - John Atkinson 11:06:36 06/12/02 (0)
- Re: So, is it the manufacturers... - Charles Hansen 19:19:37 06/11/02 (0)
- Re: Unfortunately... - Doug Schneider 16:23:14 06/11/02 (0)
- It's SOP - sjb 14:32:34 06/11/02 (0)
- A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:23:30 06/11/02 (29)
- To elaborate a little then...... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 15:18:26 06/12/02 (4)
- Re: To elaborate a little then...... - Rob Doorack 08:53:00 06/13/02 (3)
- Re: To elaborate a little then...... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:38:15 06/13/02 (2)
- Re: reviewers' equipment lists in Stereophile - Rob Doorack 10:54:13 06/13/02 (1)
- Re: reviewers' equipment lists in Stereophile - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:13:10 06/13/02 (0)
- Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Bruce from DC 15:59:26 06/11/02 (17)
- Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Robert H. 18:32:55 06/11/02 (5)
- Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - John Atkinson 11:22:56 06/12/02 (0)
- Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Kal Rubinson 19:47:15 06/11/02 (2)
- Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - John Atkinson 07:39:12 06/13/02 (1)
- Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Robert H. 14:15:08 06/13/02 (0)
- Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Charles Hansen 19:24:08 06/11/02 (0)
- "if they charactize something as 'the best I've heard at the price' that statement means a lot...." - doesnt_suit_me 17:37:09 06/11/02 (10)
- Re: "if they charactize something as 'the best I've heard at the price' that statement means a lot.. - Bruce from DC 07:33:19 06/12/02 (9)
- more on "negativity", which I consider critical thinking - doesnt_suit_me 16:57:01 06/12/02 (3)
- Re: more on "negativity", which I consider critical thinking - Bruce from DC 10:35:46 06/13/02 (2)
- You wrote: - Kal Rubinson 11:52:49 06/13/02 (1)
- Re: Sure, Kal - Bruce from DC 14:18:22 06/13/02 (0)
- Re: "if they charactize something as 'the best I've heard at the price' that statement means a lot.. - Charles Hansen 09:48:16 06/12/02 (4)
- Since we're not pulling any punches.................... - Chris Garrett 12:22:06 06/12/02 (2)
- Re: Since we're not pulling any punches.................... - Charles Hansen 21:31:00 06/12/02 (1)
- I give up.................. - Chris Garrett 09:31:56 06/13/02 (0)
- Re: ""nasty people" etc. - Bruce from DC 10:40:11 06/12/02 (0)
- That's dogma, not reality - John Marks 15:16:35 06/11/02 (5)
- Re: That's dogma, not reality - Timbo in Oz 23:02:28 06/11/02 (0)
- Pssst: it's 'Robert' Parker - hexenboden 15:42:29 06/11/02 (3)
- Refill!!!!! - John Marks 16:08:19 06/11/02 (2)
- Re: Refill!!!!! - Charles Hansen 16:18:54 06/11/02 (1)
- Re: RObert Parker - Refill!!!!! - Timbo in Oz 23:22:38 06/11/02 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: RObert Parker - Refill!!!!! - Timbo in Oz 23:22:38 06/11/02 (0)