In Reply to: Not to me posted by Dave_K on July 17, 2017 at 11:42:50:
Trying, but that's about it.
I understand why MQA wants us to compare it to Hi Rez, I just don't agree that it's is a candidate to be a 'preferred format for hi rez' because it's NOT hi rez, it's a compression of hi rez and a lossy one at that.
Yes, it's better than 16/44.1 Lossless FLAC (or TIDAL thinks so) as long as the master it is taken from is better sounding that Redbook CD. I don't disagree.
But given the choice of a paid download of a 24/96, 24/192, or even a 24/48 file and an MQA file, guess which one I'm taking?
Hint: Not the one that requires a special DAC and/or a computer algorithm to play it.
So it really doesn't matter to me if the MQA file sounds a lot like a real, no kidding hi rez file because in any and all cases, I'll take the real thing.
The ONLY use-case for MQA that I can see is when the choice is MQA or Redbook CD, which is the current TIDAL use-case.
As far as 'different masters', yes, the Redbook CD you bought in the 80's is likely from a different master than the remastered one being sold as a download in any format from 16/44.1 - 24/96 - 24/192 and/or DSD. A surprising amount of stuff recorded long ago and sold on vinyl or sold in the 80's on CD has been recently remastered and sold as a re-issue on CD and streams on TIDAL, DEEZER Elite and QOBUZ in 16/44.1 Lossless FLAC, so these comparisons with MQA are valid.
For example, most of the early catalog of the group "Dead Can Dance" (Neoclassical dark wave, world music, ethereal wave, art rock, gothic rock, pagan rock, post-punk, you-pick-the-genre) was remastered 2008 and issued on SACD (now out of print). The SACDs currently sell for outrageous prices. TIDAL will stream the re-mastered albums in lossless FLAC 16/44.1 and it sounds SO much better than the original CD of the 80's. Would MQA sound better? Sadly we don't know because TIDAL's MQA catalog is still pretty thin. :-(
ONE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION: Hi Rez Download @ $12.50 vs. MQA Download FREE!
But that's ONLY because I currently have a Meridian Explorer 2 MQA enabled DAC. ;-)
First they came for the dumb-asses
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a dumb-ass
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "MQA is trying to be the preferred format for hi-res"... - Ivan303 17:19:23 07/17/17 (11)
- RE: "MQA is trying to be the preferred format for hi-res"... - AbeCollins 09:11:09 07/19/17 (7)
- RE: "MQA is trying to be the preferred format for hi-res"... - ahendler 17:10:16 07/19/17 (6)
- Depends on what one is talking about... - Ivan303 18:15:57 07/19/17 (5)
- RE: Depends on what one is talking about... - AbeCollins 19:23:54 07/19/17 (4)
- RE: Depends on what one is talking about... - ahendler 21:25:44 07/19/17 (3)
- Yep, that's really all that matters... - Ivan303 21:49:30 07/19/17 (2)
- The problem is - AbeCollins 07:31:02 07/20/17 (1)
- I do when I stream the SAME recording... - Ivan303 08:01:55 07/20/17 (0)
- Thanks... - E-Stat 06:08:00 07/18/17 (2)
- Best one is missing.... - Ivan303 07:38:52 07/18/17 (1)
- Yep! - E-Stat 08:10:18 07/18/17 (0)