In Reply to: INTERNET BLIND TEST: MQA Core Decoding vs. Standard Hi-Res Audio posted by Archimago on July 15, 2017 at 08:21:46:
MQA vs Hi Rez comparisons seems like the wrong comparison to make.
How could an MQA version (admittedly lossey) of a Hi Rez file be expected to sound 'better' than the original without some added (unwanted) digital manipulation or other DSP?
MQA encoding of a Hi Rez file vs Redbook (16/44.1) version of that same recording would be a much better comparison because it seems like a real-world choice.
Maybe worth the effort to decode the MQA file if it indeed sounds better.
First they came for the dumb-asses
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a dumb-ass
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Seems an odd comparison... - Ivan303 08:59:19 07/15/17 (13)
- Not to me - Dave_K 11:42:50 07/17/17 (12)
- RE: "MQA is trying to be the preferred format for hi-res"... - Ivan303 17:19:23 07/17/17 (11)
- RE: "MQA is trying to be the preferred format for hi-res"... - AbeCollins 09:11:09 07/19/17 (7)
- RE: "MQA is trying to be the preferred format for hi-res"... - ahendler 17:10:16 07/19/17 (6)
- Depends on what one is talking about... - Ivan303 18:15:57 07/19/17 (5)
- RE: Depends on what one is talking about... - AbeCollins 19:23:54 07/19/17 (4)
- RE: Depends on what one is talking about... - ahendler 21:25:44 07/19/17 (3)
- Yep, that's really all that matters... - Ivan303 21:49:30 07/19/17 (2)
- The problem is - AbeCollins 07:31:02 07/20/17 (1)
- I do when I stream the SAME recording... - Ivan303 08:01:55 07/20/17 (0)
- Thanks... - E-Stat 06:08:00 07/18/17 (2)
- Best one is missing.... - Ivan303 07:38:52 07/18/17 (1)
- Yep! - E-Stat 08:10:18 07/18/17 (0)