In Reply to: Jason Victor Serenius: The MQA Shilling Mind Reader! posted by Isaak J. Garvey on June 9, 2017 at 18:35:46:
I heard a demo on Sunday by Peter McGrath. The loudspeakers were the outstanding Wilson Alexx and I believe the amplifier was a T&A integrated. I did not know what DAC was in the system. I was in between filming and needed a rest. I did not want to upset the demo by interrupting and asking system questions. The room had about 15 people in it. I took a seat in the second row slightly to the right of center. I did not know I was about to have an actual MQA'd file to same file *without MQA* demo comparison. Result: I had no expectation bias.Peter played an older South American (mixed instrument) recording saying "this is the original file". It sound flat and two dimensional and frankly non involving. It was about a 45 seconds to one minute in length. Next he announced the he was going to play the same file but with the MQA process applied.
I was astounded. The soundstage exploded, all upper frequency brittleness dissipated, the players became far more realistic and 3D and I simply enjoyed the music more. I left the room in awe.
As I reflect on the experience I believe the demo could have been more effective if: 1)the first track played was announced as the 24/96 or whatever resolution original, 2)then a second track could have been played at 16/44.1, and 3)then a third track at 16/44.1 with the MQA process applied and fully decoded.
This would have been a very powerful demo. From all I have read about MQA, this is its full potential: to encode the original high resolution file, stream or hard media store it at a lower rez and then decode at playback so as to simulate as close as possible the highest original resolution recording.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The MQA demo I heard on Sunday - Peter Breuninger 05:58:35 06/10/17 (20)
- In other words: "that reverb tank sounded real good" -t - Sordidman 10:30:37 06/13/17 (0)
- RE: The MQA demo I heard on Sunday - Todd Krieger 03:20:42 06/13/17 (1)
- And........ - Todd Krieger 03:40:20 06/13/17 (0)
- To the degree that MQA changes the sound... - Charles Hansen 11:56:19 06/10/17 (5)
- You're boring me to death ... - bjh 13:08:24 06/11/17 (3)
- Sounds like someone literally fell into the jar. nt - jusbe 14:00:40 06/15/17 (0)
- Heard MQA? nt - Rick W 11:06:56 06/14/17 (0)
- RE: You're boring me to death ... - fantja 23:53:38 06/11/17 (0)
- Last paragraph says it all NT - lancelot 12:56:21 06/10/17 (0)
- 45 seconds and you were "astounded" and "in awe" ? C'mon, Peter. nt - Rick W 11:31:11 06/10/17 (4)
- I don't know- 45 seconds into Good Bait ( Soul Trane ) - oldmkvi 12:12:39 06/13/17 (3)
- RE: I don't know- 45 seconds into Good Bait ( Soul Trane ) - Isaak J. Garvey 19:38:59 06/13/17 (0)
- Hmm, point taken. nt - Rick W 17:38:45 06/13/17 (1)
- RE: Hmm, point taken. nt - Isaak J. Garvey 19:32:35 06/13/17 (0)
- "Result: I had no expectation bias."..... - Steve O 08:42:34 06/10/17 (4)
- Most audio reviewers have other expectation bias as well - AbeCollins 06:54:33 06/13/17 (1)
- Yes, they most probably do have other biases...not that there's anything wrong with that.... - Steve O 10:27:10 06/14/17 (0)
- RE: "Result: I had no expectation bias."..... - Peter Breuninger 09:45:38 06/10/17 (1)
- "Next he announced"..... - Steve O 10:32:22 06/10/17 (0)
- RE: The MQA demo I heard on Sunday - Isaak J. Garvey 06:26:40 06/10/17 (0)