|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Gasp! More Jaws Dropping over MQA in Los Angeles! posted by Charles Hansen on June 11, 2017 at 17:41:50:
I think Tidal at least for now is not charging more for MQA because they are hoping to attract new subscribers
Regarding the 2L files, first my dac is the Audio-GD Master 7. It is a ladder dac using 8 1704 ladder dac chips. It is limited to 24/192. If I listen to the same DXD file in 16/44 24/96 24/192 and MQA there are small differences but again nothing jaw dropping. I could easily live with the 16/44 encoding. Remember the recording and masters of these 2L files is incredibly good to begin with. I may be close to the ultimate resolution of my system. Shindo preamp driving 2 Berning ZH270 amps driving Maggie 3.6 speakers. I am also 75 years old and I may be at the limits of my hearing resolutionalthough for example can still hear cable differences, even USB cables. I still know that ultimately it is the quality of the original recording and mastering that mainly determines how good a recording will sound
Alan
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Gasp! More Jaws Dropping over MQA in Los Angeles! - ahendler 19:16:31 06/11/17 (4)
- RE: Gasp! More Jaws Dropping over MQA in Los Angeles! - Charles Hansen 15:38:58 06/12/17 (0)
- They will ask for their money eventually. - jusbe 08:54:45 06/12/17 (2)
- Depends on who 'they' is.... - Ivan303 09:48:30 06/12/17 (1)
- RE: Depends on who 'they' is.... - Isaak J. Garvey 09:59:39 06/12/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
