In Reply to: RE: Interesting Video Audio Myths posted by Ric Schultz on March 15, 2017 at 19:56:08:
" looked at a 16K sign wave at -90 I don't think it would exist. Not enough bits.....this is why 24 bits is necessary."
I have sympathy for your general argument but a 16 bit system would allow a -90dB 16K sine wave signal to be reproduced with a little to spare (it has a dynamic range of 96dB), at least it would still exist, this being your point. However that is a text book kind of argument and assumes a perfect 16 bit device. In practice as you have realised it isn't quite that straightforward. However 24 bit systems are way over the top for music reproduction and, as the engineers at Decca pointed out way back in the 1980s, a 20 bit system is perfectly adequate for all of our needs.
BTW, a processor that can deal with a 24 bit word length is not the same as an audio system that can utilise the consequences i.e. to fully exploit 24 bits means a system with a S/N ratio of 144dB. And of course listening in a room with ambient noise at -144dB. Even if you had this the changes to sound at lower levels would still be inaudible as they would be masked by the sound of your own blood flow through your ears.
Digital audio has brought us another "specmanship" race. In the 1970s it was based on ever diminishing distortion figures ( Your amp has 0.0001% distortion, ours is better as it has 0.00001%), now it's word length and sample rates. When I read of 32bit/768Ks/s for audio I laugh. No, cry.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Interesting Video Audio Myths - Rad21 14:54:48 03/15/17 (13)
- RE: Interesting Video Audio Myths - airtime 08:11:14 03/17/17 (0)
- RE: Interesting Video Audio Myths - knewton 12:20:00 03/16/17 (0)
- RE: Interesting Video Audio Myths - Ric Schultz 19:56:08 03/15/17 (9)
- RE: Interesting Video Audio Myths - flood2 01:25:16 04/01/17 (0)
- RE: Interesting Video Audio Myths - PAR 05:51:30 03/16/17 (2)
- RE: Interesting Video Audio Myths - Ric Schultz 21:01:31 03/16/17 (1)
- RE: Interesting Video Audio Myths - fantja 23:56:18 03/16/17 (0)
- RE: Interesting Video Audio Myths - RGA 04:25:31 03/16/17 (4)
- Yes - that's been around for awhile - still excellent IMHO [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 16:39:52 03/15/17 (0)