In Reply to: RE: Mr. Darko may be missing a few facts... posted by PAR on January 12, 2017 at 09:16:36:
There still appears to be a lot of speculation and confusion surrounding MQA.Right now MQA seems like unnecessary smoke and mirrors with lots of complexity wrapped up in great marketing spin. The next new thing for audiophiles to play with and the founders to profit from. Next.
Even if MQA offers outstanding results, I'm not sure how it will benefit ME. I have thousands of music files already ripped or downloaded that sound outstanding on my present equipment. I'm not likely to repurchase my music in MQA.
I suppose if I were to subscribe to Tidal it may be beneficial for streaming.
Until MQA goes more main stream, I'll sit on the sidelines as I often do as I am not an early adopter. But I'll probably give it a try someday unless it dies on the vine.
What ever happened to Pono? Still under construction? ;-)
Edits: 01/12/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Mr. Darko may be missing a few facts... - AbeCollins 10:11:13 01/12/17 (3)
- Wake me up about MQA when - E-Stat 10:50:18 01/12/17 (0)
- RE: Mr. Darko may be missing a few facts... - Mr_Steady 10:34:27 01/12/17 (1)
- RE: Mr. Darko may be missing a few facts... - AbeCollins 12:48:29 01/12/17 (0)