RE: MQA comparison

Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

In Reply to: RE: MQA comparison posted by Roseval on July 14, 2016 at 11:44:09:

I wonder how many people don't realize that MQA is a lossy compression scheme. Even the Mytek rep's convoluted sales pitch in the Raven Audio room at the Capital Audiofest didn't mention this point. Instead it was all about 'timing errors', etc.

To me MQA is mainly a numbers game (i.e. marketing) and a way for the record companies to 'support' high-res audio without giving people the chance to have a copy of the real goods.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

McShane Design

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - MQA comparison - G Squared 18:46:38 07/11/16 (7)

RE: MQA comparison - ahendler 07:45:31 07/12/16 (6)

RE: MQA comparison - G Squared 12:35:16 07/12/16 (5)

RE: MQA comparison - Roseval 13:22:31 07/14/16 (0)

RE: MQA comparison - ahendler 18:30:56 07/12/16 (3)

RE: MQA comparison - Roseval 11:44:09 07/14/16 (2)

RE: MQA comparison - ahendler 14:36:34 07/14/16 (0)

RE: MQA comparison - yage 12:42:55 07/14/16 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: MQA comparison - yage 12:42:55 07/14/16 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.