RE: Not at 44.1 kHz. nt

Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Why would I want selectable Digital Filters in a DAC? - jedrider 15:05:57 08/31/15 (45)

Go down to Tony Lauck's reply and ignore - fmak 05:04:50 09/03/15 (3)

Blind squirrel finds nut... - Ivan303 07:21:46 09/03/15 (1)

Yes but can he "bust" said nut? n/t - Awe-d-o-file 07:35:51 09/04/15 (0)

+1 - Awe-d-o-file 05:10:35 09/03/15 (0)

RE: Why would I want selectable Digital Filters in a DAC? - AbeCollins 21:21:10 09/02/15 (0)

I remember back-in-the-day when Wadia was initially skewered... - meisterkleef 09:11:26 09/02/15 (0)

I stay away from ANY machine which has selectable filters - jbcortes 08:46:52 09/02/15 (8)

"I want designers who have balls and make a statement through their product. I don't want to have a choice " - Awe-d-o-file 05:08:47 09/03/15 (2)

RE: "A compromise".... - Ivan303 07:28:00 09/03/15 (1)

RE: "A compromise".... - Awe-d-o-file 07:39:48 09/04/15 (0)

"I have a DAC I adore now" - oldmkvi 09:03:36 09/02/15 (4)

RE: "I have a DAC I adore now" - jbcortes 10:11:03 09/02/15 (3)

RE: "I have a DAC I adore now" - Todd Krieger 16:54:55 09/02/15 (0)

We only have 'Smoke'N Grills' here that are Brinkmann's NT - jedrider 10:49:09 09/02/15 (0)

OK, Thanks. nt - oldmkvi 10:19:33 09/02/15 (0)

Because recordings are made with different filters - Tony Lauck 09:21:49 09/01/15 (7)

RE: Because recordings are made with different filters - Todd Krieger 12:13:19 09/02/15 (1)

RE: Because recordings are made with different filters - Tony Lauck 12:49:07 09/02/15 (0)

Agreed. And for me, the only credible reason. nt - jusbe 18:24:39 09/01/15 (0)

RE: Because recordings are made with different filters - Dynobot 10:32:47 09/01/15 (2)

RE: Because recordings are made with different filters - Tony Lauck 10:57:35 09/01/15 (1)

RE: Because recordings are made with different filters - Dynobot 16:37:06 09/01/15 (0)

Now, you have REALLY messed up my mind - jedrider 10:27:17 09/01/15 (0)

RE: Why would I want selectable Digital Filters in a DAC? - Thorsten 08:22:28 09/01/15 (0)

Because...... - Todd Krieger 22:38:25 08/31/15 (12)

So, PERFECT sound is not even possible! - jedrider 09:15:41 09/01/15 (11)

RE: So, PERFECT sound is not even possible! - Todd Krieger 11:34:30 09/02/15 (0)

But whatever sound it is.... - Ivan303 14:35:17 09/01/15 (1)

Not possible, forever? (nt) - Crazy Dave 07:53:31 09/02/15 (0)

What is perfect sound? - sbrians 12:33:19 09/01/15 (1)

Doesn't matter, as long as it's "Forever" - genungo 13:04:35 09/01/15 (0)

However, CD can be much better than most vinylphiles think - John Marks 09:54:30 09/01/15 (1)

Agreed...... But......... - Todd Krieger 11:25:24 09/02/15 (0)

Not at 44.1 kHz. nt - Tony Lauck 09:25:05 09/01/15 (3)

RE: Not at 44.1 kHz. nt +10 - fmak 05:07:25 09/03/15 (0)

Disagree. - jusbe 18:27:08 09/01/15 (0)

RE: Not at 44.1 kHz. nt - ahendler 17:09:52 09/01/15 (0)

Because Minimum Phase Filters are Inherently Superior, but some folks insist on driving Edsels - John Marks 19:23:16 08/31/15 (0)

RE: Why would I want selectable Digital Filters in a DAC? - Doug A 18:11:31 08/31/15 (0)

RE: Why would I want selectable Digital Filters in a DAC? - PAR 16:13:44 08/31/15 (0)

RE: Why would I want selectable Digital Filters in a DAC? - Kal Rubinson 15:26:39 08/31/15 (4)

RE: "yet another confusing distraction that leads to compulsive behavior"... - Ivan303 15:51:32 08/31/15 (3)

RE: "yet another confusing distraction that leads to compulsive behavior"... - Kal Rubinson 17:04:35 08/31/15 (2)

RE: 'fickle' - Ivan303 19:50:36 08/31/15 (1)

RE: 'fickle' - Kal Rubinson 06:47:36 09/01/15 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Not at 44.1 kHz. nt - ahendler 17:09:52 09/01/15 (0)

Post a Message!