68.46.3.150
This Post Has Been Edited by the Author
In Reply to: RE: Why not just say it was an Arcam rDac...not exactly 2x the cost. posted by Dynobot on June 05, 2012 at 15:33:36
Mainly, because it is not an Arcam rDac. ( I actually do have that one also & I believe it does use a Wolfson chip.). If memory serves me correct the rDAC is only about $129 more & is not quite as good as the Musical Fidelity M1 I was using.
I really did'nt want to come out & name it as I still thing the MF is a pretty good product. If the up sampling could be disabled I think it might trump the Bifrost.
Follow Ups:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2012, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ Take5 ]