|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Jitter vs sampling rate. posted by sbrians on July 27, 2012 at 12:47:26:
Sbrians,
Actually with every division by 2 you gain 3dB better jitter performance. While this is a maximum it is pretty easy to obtain. So 44.1 would be 3dB better than 88.2 and so forth. Mixing and upsampling do not apply here!
But just thinking like this is crazy stupid. Look jitter is what it is and is NOT all what you are hearing. There are a ton of variables to think about when you design digital audio equipment. This is only one of them.
Thanks
Gordon
J. Gordon Rankin
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Jitter vs sampling rate. - Gordon Rankin 08:08:16 07/30/12 (7)
- RE: Jitter vs sampling rate. - audioengr 10:20:58 07/30/12 (6)
- Jitter is often expressed as a percentage of clock period ... - slider 11:27:25 07/30/12 (5)
- RE: Jitter is often expressed as a percentage of clock period ... - audioengr 14:00:20 07/30/12 (4)
- RE: Jitter is often expressed as a percentage of clock period ... - Tony Lauck 17:35:14 07/30/12 (2)
- Remember - Gordon Rankin 07:28:12 07/31/12 (1)
- RE: Remember - Tony Lauck 07:42:26 07/31/12 (0)
- Agreed ... to an extent - slider 16:25:57 07/30/12 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
