In Reply to: Is there really any advantage in balanced digital lines over unbalanced? posted by John C. - Aussie on May 31, 2012 at 21:13:23:
In a digital audio interface, there could be an advantage via a balanced interface due to jitter. A balanced digital interface can have the same benefit as any other balanced signal interface, that being the rejection of common-mode noise. Such noise could degrade the jitter performance of the DAC input reciever.There would be further advantage in the AES differential balanced interface if the signal amplitude was much smaller, as it is in LVDS digital interface technology. Differential circuits inherently have twice the slew rate (which is better for minimizing interface jitter) than an single ended implementation of the same circuit. That potential benefit is erased if the signal voltage itself is more than double what it needs to be.
_
Ken Newton
Edits: 06/01/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Is there really any advantage in balanced digital lines over unbalanced? - knewton 06:24:57 06/01/12 (17)
- RE: Slew rate. - rick_m 07:21:42 06/01/12 (16)
- RE: Slew rate. - knewton 13:07:30 06/01/12 (15)
- RE: Slew rate. - Bromo33333 06:48:39 06/06/12 (0)
- RE: Slew rate. - rick_m 18:39:26 06/01/12 (9)
- RE: Slew rate. - knewton 19:35:49 06/01/12 (8)
- RE: Slew rate. - rick_m 08:22:51 06/02/12 (7)
- RE: Slew rate. - knewton 11:41:32 06/02/12 (3)
- RE: Slew rate. - rick_m 18:08:35 06/02/12 (0)
- Higher slew rates can make interface jitter worse - slider 12:54:21 06/02/12 (1)
- RE: Higher slew rates can make interface jitter worse - knewton 05:16:43 06/03/12 (0)
- RE: Slew rate. - Tony Lauck 10:17:04 06/02/12 (2)
- RE: Slew rate. - rick_m 14:07:12 06/02/12 (1)
- RE: Slew rate. - Tony Lauck 17:16:18 06/02/12 (0)
- RE: Slew rate. - John Swenson 15:34:49 06/01/12 (3)
- RE: Slew rate. - Tony Lauck 10:07:55 06/02/12 (0)
- RE: Slew rate. - knewton 16:17:34 06/01/12 (1)
- RE: Slew rate. - tonyptony 16:26:03 06/02/12 (0)