In Reply to: BB PCM1704 and PCM1702...nuff said. (nt) posted by audio39 on March 18, 2012 at 16:17:04:
OK, these are pretty old chips unable to decode 24/192 audio, and are very
Ikely inferior to even newer BB products (like the 1798). So what is your point?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: BB PCM1704 and PCM1702...nuff said. (nt) - Rob Bertrando 13:24:02 03/20/12 (11)
- wait a minute -- that's incorrect - Joe Murphy Jr 15:41:12 03/22/12 (0)
- RE: BB PCM1704 and PCM1702...nuff said. (nt) - audio39 05:53:46 03/21/12 (6)
- RE: BB PCM1704 and PCM1702...nuff said. (nt) - knewton 06:13:46 03/21/12 (5)
- RE: BB PCM1704 and PCM1702...nuff said. (nt) - Tony Lauck 07:12:54 03/21/12 (4)
- RE: BB PCM1704 and PCM1702...nuff said. (nt) - audio39 09:14:07 03/21/12 (3)
- RE: BB PCM1704 and PCM1702...nuff said. (nt) - thebordas 11:42:51 03/24/12 (0)
- RE: BB PCM1704 and PCM1702...nuff said. (nt) - AbeCollins 21:35:09 03/21/12 (1)
- RE: BB PCM1704 and PCM1702...nuff said. (nt) - audio39 04:07:49 03/22/12 (0)
- Haha BB 1798 - Dynobot 14:41:00 03/20/12 (2)
- RE: Haha BB 1798 - Rob Bertrando 17:35:53 03/20/12 (1)
- RE: Haha BB 1798 - Dynobot 17:50:45 03/20/12 (0)