12.72.210.39
This Post Has Been Edited by the Author
In Reply to: RE: Here's the Technical Deal...... posted by Todd Krieger on November 17, 2007 at 14:27:42
That link just shows what I said, 96K isn't a multiple of the dsd sample rate. You have to go higher to get a common multiple, and then decimate. I think that's well understood by now.
Thanks for the link, but again, that didn't really have anything to do with my question about CD upsampling, and whether dsd upsampling was anything new.
Follow Ups: